Khanna Jotinder, Singh J P, Kulshreshtha Pranjal, Kalra Pawan, Priyambada Binita, Mohil R S, Bhatnagar Dinesh
Department of surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi-110023, India.
BMC Emerg Med. 2005 Oct 14;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-5-8.
An important factor contributing to the high mortality in patients with severe head trauma is cerebral hypoxia. The mechanical ventilation helps both by reduction in the intracranial pressure and hypoxia. Ventilatory support is also required in these patients because of patient's inability to protect the airway, persistence of excessive secretions, and inadequacy of spontaneous ventilation. Prolonged endotracheal intubation is however associated with trauma to the larynx, trachea, and patient discomfort in addition to requirement of sedatives. Tracheostomy has been found to play an integral role in the airway management of such patients, but its timing remains subject to considerable practice variation. In a developing country like India where the intensive care facilities are scarce and rarely available, these critical patients have to be managed in high dependency cubicles in the ward, often with inadequately trained nursing staff and equipment to monitor them. An early tracheostomy in the selected group of patients based on Glasgow Coma Score(GCS) may prove to be life saving. Against this background a prospective study was contemplated to assess the role of early tracheostomy in patients with isolated closed head injury.
The series consisted of a cohort of 50 patients admitted to the surgical emergency with isolated closed head injury, that were not considered for surgery by the neuro-surgeon or shifted to ICU, but had GCS score of less than 8 and SAPS II score of more than 50. First 50 case records from January 2001 that fulfilled the criteria constituted the control group. The patients were managed as per ATLS protocol and intubated if required at any time before decision to perform tracheostomy was taken. These patients were serially assessed for GCS (worst score of the day as calculated by senior surgical resident) and SAPS scores till day 15 to chart any changes in their status of head injuries and predictive mortality. Those patients who continued to have a GCS score of <8 and SAPS score of >50 for more than 24 hours (to rule out concussion or recovery) underwent tracheostomy. All these patients were finally assessed for mortality rate and hospital stay, the statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS10 version. The final outcome (in terms of mortality) was analyzed utilizing chi-square test and p value <0.05 was considered significant.
At admission both tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups were matched with respect to GCS score and SAPS score. The average day of tracheostomy was 2.18 +/- 1.0038 days. The GCS scores on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 between tracheostomy and non-tracheostomized group were comparable. However the difference in the GCS scores was statistically significant on day 15 being higher in the tracheostomy group. Thus early tracheostomy was observed to improve the mortality rate significantly in patients with isolated closed head injury.
It may be concluded that early tracheostomy is beneficial in patients with isolated closed head injury which is severe enough to affect systemic physiological parameters, in terms of decreased mortality and intubation associated complications in centers where ICU care is not readily available. Also, in a selected group of patients, early tracheostomy may do away with the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation.
导致重度颅脑外伤患者高死亡率的一个重要因素是脑缺氧。机械通气有助于降低颅内压和缓解缺氧。由于患者无法保护气道、持续存在过多分泌物以及自主通气不足,这些患者也需要通气支持。然而,长时间气管插管除了需要使用镇静剂外,还会导致喉部、气管损伤以及患者不适。已发现气管切开术在此类患者的气道管理中起着不可或缺的作用,但其时机仍存在很大的实践差异。在像印度这样重症监护设施稀缺且难以获得的发展中国家,这些重症患者不得不在病房的高依赖隔间进行管理,护理人员往往训练不足,监测设备也不完善。基于格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)在选定患者组中尽早进行气管切开术可能会挽救生命。在此背景下,开展了一项前瞻性研究,以评估早期气管切开术在单纯闭合性颅脑损伤患者中的作用。
该系列研究包括50例因单纯闭合性颅脑损伤入住外科急诊的患者,神经外科医生认为这些患者不适合手术或已转入重症监护病房,且GCS评分低于8分,简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)高于50分。2001年1月起符合标准的前50例病例记录构成对照组。患者按照高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)方案进行管理,在决定进行气管切开术之前,如有需要可随时进行插管。对这些患者连续评估GCS(由资深外科住院医师计算的当日最差评分)和SAPS评分,直至第15天,以记录其头部损伤状况和预测死亡率的任何变化。那些GCS评分持续<8分且SAPS评分>50分超过24小时(以排除脑震荡或恢复情况)的患者接受气管切开术。最终对所有这些患者的死亡率和住院时间进行评估,使用SPSS10版本进行统计分析。利用卡方检验分析最终结果(死亡率方面),p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
入院时,气管切开术组和非气管切开术组在GCS评分和SAPS评分方面相匹配。气管切开术的平均时间为2.18 +/- 1.0038天。气管切开术组和未行气管切开术组在第1、2、3、4、5、10天的GCS评分相当。然而,在第15天,气管切开术组的GCS评分差异具有统计学意义,且更高。因此,观察到早期气管切开术可显著提高单纯闭合性颅脑损伤患者的死亡率。
可以得出结论,对于单纯闭合性颅脑损伤严重到足以影响全身生理参数的患者,在重症监护不易获得的中心,早期气管切开术在降低死亡率和减少插管相关并发症方面是有益的。此外,在选定的患者组中,早期气管切开术可能无需长时间机械通气。