Elliott Emily M, Cowan Nelson
Louisiana State University, Department of Psychology, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):664-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03195333.
We examined individual and developmental differences in the disruptive effects of irrelevant sounds on serial recall of printed lists. In Experiment 1, we examined adults (N = 205) receiving eight-item lists to be recalled. Although their susceptibility to disruption of recall by irrelevant sounds was only slightly related to memory span, regression analyses documented highly reliable individual differences in this susceptibility across speech and tone distractors, even with variance from span level removed. In Experiment 2, we examined adults (n = 64) and 8-year-old children (n = 63) receiving lists of a length equal to a predetermined span and one item shorter (span-1). We again found significant relationships between measures of span and susceptibility to irrelevant sounds, although in only two of the measures. We conclude that some of the cognitive processes helpful in performing a span task may not be beneficial in the presence of irrelevant sounds.
我们研究了无关声音对印刷列表序列回忆的干扰效应中的个体差异和发展差异。在实验1中,我们测试了205名成年人,他们要回忆八项目的列表。尽管他们对无关声音干扰回忆的易感性与记忆广度仅有微弱关联,但回归分析表明,即使去除了广度水平的方差,在语音和音调干扰物方面,这种易感性仍存在高度可靠的个体差异。在实验2中,我们测试了64名成年人和63名8岁儿童,他们接收的列表长度等于预先确定的广度减一项(广度-1)。我们再次发现广度测量与对无关声音的易感性之间存在显著关系,不过仅在两项测量中。我们得出结论,一些有助于完成广度任务的认知过程在存在无关声音时可能并无益处。