Baddeley A D
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, England.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):544-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03214369.
Neath (2000) presents a useful overview of the evidence to be explained by any model of the effects of irrelevant speech on immediate serial memory and proposes a model accompanied by computational simulation. While his review is in general accurate, it is limited in its explanation of the crucial characteristics of the disrupting sounds. It also neglects strategic issues, particularly the tendency for subjects to switch strategy as list length increases. As a result, his model fails to account for the absence of an interaction between irrelevant speech and acoustic similarity for lists of span length. Points of issue between Neath's feature hypothesis and the phonological loop interpretation are outlined, and the contribution of his computational simulation is discussed.
尼斯（2000）对任何关于无关言语对即时系列记忆影响的模型所应解释的证据进行了有益的概述，并提出了一个伴有计算模拟的模型。虽然他的综述总体上是准确的，但在解释干扰声音的关键特征方面存在局限性。它还忽略了策略问题，特别是随着列表长度增加受试者改变策略的倾向。因此，他的模型无法解释对于跨度长度的列表，无关言语与声学相似性之间不存在相互作用的情况。概述了尼斯的特征假设与语音回路解释之间的争议点，并讨论了他的计算模拟的贡献。
