Hoffman W Y
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;25(3):649-67.
The challenge of reconstruction in the paralyzed face is to provide symmetry both at rest and in active expression. Although functional considerations must take precedence, the patient with unilateral facial palsy faces social stigmata that are exceptionally difficult. The best reconstructions in late paralyses fall far short of natural facial expression. Conley, one of the pioneers in facial nerve rehabilitation, reflected the frustration of dealing with limited techniques: It has been assumed by many surgeons that involuntary emotional communication is through the facial nerve, but this has never been substantiated. Indeed, emotional expression may be beyond our concept of a mere physical tract. It certainly has never been totally restored by any surgical technique that attempts to rehabilitate the face. When injury to the facial nerve is established, early nerve grafting on the ipsilateral side is the best treatment. In acoustic neuroma and other intracranial operations, the only real opportunity for grafting or repair is at the time of the procedure. If the nature of the injury is uncertain, a period of 12 months is allowed to elapse before consideration of intervention, which should be started if there is no return of function at that point. Electromyography may be of assistance in assessing minimal early return; if any early return is noted, further waiting is indicated. If there is no return at 1 year, cranial nerve XII to VII crossover will preserve facial muscle tone and permit a more measured decision-making approach. Patients with multiple cranial nerves involved may be candidates for a partial hypoglossal transfer using a nerve graft, to attempt to preserve swallowing. In selected cases, cross-facial nerve grafting to the preserved facial muscles will give excellent results and obviate the need for local or distant muscle transfers. When treating established paralysis of long duration, cross-facial nerve grafting with microneurovascular muscle transfer is the best option for symmetrical movement of the face. Temporalis and masseter muscle transfers should be reserved for the patient with intercurrent medical disease or the patient who refuses additional operations or operative sites. Static slings and other related procedures should be considered adjunctive but not primary treatment in the vast majority of cases. Although there are limitations in each of the procedures described, close cooperation between the otolaryngologist, the neurosurgeon, and the plastic surgeon can provide many patients with satisfactory rehabilitation from facial paralysis.
面瘫面部重建的挑战在于在静态和动态表情时都实现对称。尽管功能因素必须优先考虑,但单侧面瘫患者面临着异常困难的社会污名。晚期面瘫的最佳重建远不及自然面部表情。面部神经康复的先驱之一康利反映了应对有限技术的挫败感:许多外科医生认为非自主情感交流是通过面神经进行的,但这从未得到证实。事实上,情感表达可能超出了我们对单纯物理通道的概念。通过任何试图修复面部的外科技术,它肯定从未被完全恢复。当确定面神经损伤时,同侧早期神经移植是最佳治疗方法。在听神经瘤和其他颅内手术中,移植或修复的唯一真正机会是在手术过程中。如果损伤的性质不确定,在考虑干预之前允许经过12个月,如果那时仍没有功能恢复则应开始干预。肌电图可能有助于评估最小的早期恢复情况;如果注意到任何早期恢复,则表明需要进一步等待。如果1年后仍无恢复, XII至VII颅神经交叉将保留面部肌肉张力,并允许采取更慎重的决策方法。涉及多条颅神经的患者可能是使用神经移植进行部分舌下神经转移的候选者,以试图保留吞咽功能。在选定的病例中,将跨面神经移植到保留的面部肌肉上会取得出色的效果,并且无需进行局部或远处肌肉转移。在治疗长期存在的面瘫时,跨面神经移植联合显微神经血管肌肉转移是实现面部对称运动的最佳选择。颞肌和咬肌转移应保留给患有并发内科疾病的患者或拒绝额外手术或手术部位的患者。在绝大多数情况下,静态悬吊和其他相关手术应被视为辅助治疗而非主要治疗。尽管所描述的每种手术都有局限性,但耳鼻喉科医生、神经外科医生和整形外科医生之间的密切合作可以为许多面瘫患者提供令人满意的康复效果。