Rawlins Mindy L, Gerstner Cecilia, Hill Harry R, Litwin Christine M
Associated Regional and University Pathologists (ARUP) Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Nov;12(11):1269-74. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.11.1269-1274.2005.
Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis have been identified as causative organisms of reactive arthritis in humans. We evaluated a Western blot assay which uses Yersinia outer membrane proteins as antigens for the detection of Yersinia antibodies as a replacement for the complement fixation (CF) assay. Clinical agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were determined by testing 19 positive and 21 negative serum samples by the CF assay, Western blot assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The CF assay and ELISA were compared to the Western blot assay, which was the reference method used in this study. Sera with antibodies that could potentially cross-react with Yersinia were also tested by the Western blot assay. The agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the CF method were 61%, 26%, and 95%, respectively; and those for the ELISA were 89%, 95%, and 82%, respectively. The prevalences of Yersinia antibodies in 50 healthy donors were 6% for immunoglobulin G (IgG), 2% for IgA, and 2% for IgM. Sera positive for Bartonella henselae, Brucella, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Rickettsia rickettsii antibodies showed cross-reactivity by the Western blot assay. The highest cross-reactivity was observed with Borrelia burgdorferi; 5 of 11 (45%) specimens were cross-reactive by the IgM-specific assay. Overall, the Western blot assay performs acceptably and is more sensitive than the CF assay, warranting replacement of the CF assay in the laboratory. Due to the evidence of cross-reactivity, particularly with B. burgdorferi, which can cause an oligoarthritis similar to reactive arthritis, the diagnosis of reactive arthritis should be based on clinical findings and complete serologic analysis of the potential causative infectious pathogens.
小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌和假结核耶尔森菌已被确认为人类反应性关节炎的致病微生物。我们评估了一种蛋白质印迹分析方法,该方法使用耶尔森菌外膜蛋白作为抗原检测耶尔森菌抗体,以替代补体结合(CF)试验。通过CF试验、蛋白质印迹分析和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)对19份阳性和21份阴性血清样本进行检测,从而确定临床一致性、敏感性和特异性。将CF试验和ELISA与蛋白质印迹分析进行比较,蛋白质印迹分析是本研究中使用的参考方法。对可能与耶尔森菌发生交叉反应的抗体血清也采用蛋白质印迹分析进行检测。CF方法的一致性、敏感性和特异性分别为61%、26%和95%;ELISA的一致性、敏感性和特异性分别为89%、95%和82%。50名健康供体中耶尔森菌抗体的患病率为:免疫球蛋白G(IgG)为6%,IgA为2%,IgM为2%。亨氏巴尔通体、布鲁氏菌、肺炎衣原体和立氏立克次体抗体阳性的血清通过蛋白质印迹分析显示有交叉反应。观察到与伯氏疏螺旋体的交叉反应性最高;在11份标本中有5份(45%)通过IgM特异性试验呈交叉反应。总体而言,蛋白质印迹分析表现良好,且比CF试验更敏感,值得在实验室中取代CF试验。由于存在交叉反应的证据,特别是与可引起类似于反应性关节炎的寡关节炎的伯氏疏螺旋体的交叉反应,反应性关节炎的诊断应基于临床发现以及对潜在致病感染病原体的完整血清学分析。