• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得性或退行性脑损伤患者的主观健康及健康相关生活质量评估。

Assessment of subjective health and health-related quality of life in persons with acquired or degenerative brain injury.

作者信息

von Steinbuechel Nicole, Richter Sylvia, Morawetz Carmen, Riemsma Rob

机构信息

Medical Psychology, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Curr Opin Neurol. 2005 Dec;18(6):681-91. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000194140.56429.75.

DOI:10.1097/01.wco.0000194140.56429.75
PMID:16280680
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Health-related quality of life is a new outcome variable in neurology. Several generic measures aim at assessing this variable in adults with neurological diseases. Disease-specific measures are still rare; however, individuals with neurological diseases frequently suffer from cognitive impairment, yet are often excluded from health-related quality of life investigations. When included in such studies, cognitive functioning is not monitored via neuropsychological evaluation, possibly leading to methodological problems. Papers from May 2004 until July 2005 are reviewed with respect to psychometric quality and information about persons after traumatic brain injury, stroke, Parkinson's disease or dementia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several new cross-sectional and longitudinal outcome studies are reviewed. The Medical Outcome Study Short Form with 36 items, the Sickness Impact Profile and the Nottingham Health Profile were identified as the most frequently used measures in neurology. For traumatic brain injury, two new generic instrument validations (Life Satisfaction Index-A, Subjective Quality of Life Profile) and one internationally validated disease-specific development (Quality of Life after Brain Injury) were found; for stroke, one disease-specific tool (Burden of Stroke Scale) was identified. In Parkinson's disease, the disease-specific health-related quality of life measure Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 is well validated. In dementia, three dementia-specific instruments (Quality of Life for Dementia, Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale and Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale) seem to be valid.

SUMMARY

In neurology, only a few measures have been developed and validated for respondents with cognitive impairment, often showing poorer validity results than studies involving healthy persons. Health-related quality of life assessment should therefore be validated in the specific diseases and, if necessary, combined with a neuropsychological evaluation and a disease-specific health-related quality of life measure.

摘要

综述目的

健康相关生活质量是神经病学中的一个新的结局变量。有几种通用测量方法旨在评估患有神经系统疾病的成年人的这一变量。针对特定疾病的测量方法仍然很少;然而,患有神经系统疾病的个体经常遭受认知障碍,但在健康相关生活质量调查中却常常被排除在外。当纳入此类研究时,认知功能并非通过神经心理学评估进行监测,这可能会导致方法学问题。本文回顾了2004年5月至2005年7月间有关创伤性脑损伤、中风、帕金森病或痴呆患者的心理测量质量及相关信息的论文。

最新发现

回顾了几项新的横断面和纵向结局研究。医学结局研究36项简表、疾病影响量表和诺丁汉健康量表被确定为神经病学中最常用的测量方法。对于创伤性脑损伤,发现了两项新的通用工具验证(生活满意度指数A、主观生活质量量表)和一项经过国际验证的特定疾病发展量表(脑损伤后生活质量量表);对于中风,确定了一种特定疾病工具(中风负担量表)。在帕金森病中,特定疾病的健康相关生活质量测量工具帕金森病问卷-39得到了充分验证。在痴呆症方面,三种特定于痴呆症的工具(痴呆症生活质量量表、晚期痴呆症生活质量量表和阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表)似乎有效。

总结

在神经病学中,针对认知障碍患者开发并验证的测量方法很少,其有效性结果通常比涉及健康人的研究要差。因此,健康相关生活质量评估应在特定疾病中进行验证,如有必要,可结合神经心理学评估和特定疾病的健康相关生活质量测量方法。

相似文献

1
Assessment of subjective health and health-related quality of life in persons with acquired or degenerative brain injury.获得性或退行性脑损伤患者的主观健康及健康相关生活质量评估。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2005 Dec;18(6):681-91. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000194140.56429.75.
2
General health status measures for people with cognitive impairment: learning disability and acquired brain injury.认知障碍患者的一般健康状况测量:学习障碍与后天性脑损伤
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(6):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta5060.
3
4
Assessment of health-related quality of life in persons after traumatic brain injury--development of the Qolibri, a specific measure.创伤性脑损伤患者健康相关生活质量评估——Qolibri特定测量方法的开发
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;93:43-9. doi: 10.1007/3-211-27577-0_6.
5
Instruments measuring the disease-specific quality of life of family carers of people with neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.测量神经退行性疾病患者家庭照顾者特定疾病生活质量的工具:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e013611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013611.
6
A review of quality of life in Alzheimer's disease. Part 1: Issues in assessing disease impact.阿尔茨海默病患者生活质量综述。第一部分:评估疾病影响的相关问题。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Nov;14(5):499-530. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814050-00004.
7
Health-related quality-of-life scales in Parkinson's disease: critique and recommendations.帕金森病相关生存质量量表:评价与建议。
Mov Disord. 2011 Nov;26(13):2371-80. doi: 10.1002/mds.23834. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
9
Quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury-basic issues, assessment and recommendations.创伤性脑损伤患者的生活质量——基本问题、评估与建议
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002;20(3-4):111-24.
10
Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life.颅脑损伤后生活质量(QOLIBRI):量表的有效性和生活质量的相关性。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Jul;27(7):1157-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1077.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life after Brain Injury in children aged six and seven years (QOLIBRI-KIDDY) - development and scale analysis of the first disease-specific self-report instrument for young children after traumatic brain injury.6至7岁儿童脑损伤后的生活质量(QOLIBRI-KIDDY)——创伤性脑损伤后针对幼儿的首个特定疾病自我报告工具的开发与量表分析
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 May 14;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00890-5.
2
Exploration of the Determinants of Subjective Health and Depression Using Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging Data.利用韩国老年纵向研究数据探索主观健康和抑郁的决定因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;12(14):1424. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141424.
3
Final Validation of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury for Children and Adolescents (QOLIBRI-KID/ADO) Questionnaire.
儿童和青少年脑损伤后生活质量问卷(QOLIBRI-KID/ADO)的最终验证
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 5;11(4):438. doi: 10.3390/children11040438.
4
Post-stroke Cognition is Associated with Stroke Survivor Quality of Life and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.卒中后认知与卒中幸存者生活质量和照护者结局相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Dec;34(4):1235-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09635-5. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
Quality of Life after Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents (QOLIBRI-KID/ADO)-The First Disease-Specific Self-Report Questionnaire after Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童和青少年脑损伤后的生活质量(QOLIBRI-KID/ADO)——创伤性脑损伤后首个针对特定疾病的自我报告问卷。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 26;12(15):4898. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154898.
6
Social participation and health-related quality of life before and during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in individuals with traumatic brain injury: A follow-up exploratory correlational study.社交参与和创伤性脑损伤个体在新冠疫情第二波期间及前后的健康相关生活质量:一项随访探索性相关性研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun 30;55:jrm4530. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.4350.
7
A Multidimensional Approach to Assessing Factors Impacting Health-Related Quality of Life after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.一种评估小儿创伤性脑损伤后影响健康相关生活质量因素的多维方法。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3895. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123895.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Qualitative Comparison of Perspectives of Children and Adolescents after TBI and a Comparison Group without a History of TBI.小儿创伤性脑损伤后的健康相关生活质量:对创伤性脑损伤后儿童和青少年的观点与无创伤性脑损伤病史的对照组进行定性比较。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 16;11(22):6783. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226783.
9
Comparing the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale as Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury Research.比较脑损伤后的生活质量——总体量表和生活满意度量表作为创伤性脑损伤研究的结果测量指标。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3352-3363. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7546. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
10
Neuropsychological and behavioral disorders, functional outcomes and quality of life in traumatic brain injury victims.颅脑损伤患者的神经心理学和行为障碍、功能结局和生活质量。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 11;38:346. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.346.16120. eCollection 2021.