Walker M D, Salek S S, Bayer A J
Medicines Research Unit, University of Wales, Cardiff.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Nov;14(5):499-530. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814050-00004.
There are numerous methods available for assessing patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or other forms of dementia. Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment is unique among these methods, because the QOL concept itself includes a subjective component that is fundamental to its measurement. It could be argued that measuring quality of life is just as important as measuring disease severity, disease progression, symptom response, cognition, behavioural disturbance and activities of daily living when assessing the impact of disease and intervention in dementia. The subjective nature of quality of life provides healthcare professionals with the opportunity of incorporating the value systems of patients and their carers into their assessments. A systematic review was carried out to include the published data (and some unpublished data) on QOL assessment tools and instruments that claim to measure quality of life in dementia. Literature for this review was identified by a thorough search of computer databases (1980-1997) that included Medline, Embase, PsychLit and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Reports concerning the conceptualisation, development, validation, reliability, reproducibility, comprehensiveness, practicality and use of QOL instruments in dementia/AD were selected for review as well as papers documenting clinical drug trials in this therapeutic area. A number of measures or methods used in the literature for assessing the quality of life of patients with dementing illnesses were identified. It was decided to present the resulting review in 2 parts that correspond to the 2 main groups into which the instruments were categorised. The first (part 1) looks at measures used to assess the impact of disease as well as instruments at a developmental or testing stage. The second (part 2) includes instruments that claim to measure quality of life in studies documenting the impact of a drug in this therapeutic area. There are as yet no validated methods of assessing the quality of life of both patients with dementia and their carers at the same time. QOL outcomes for these 2 groups is closely, if not fundamentally, linked and yet most studies identified in this review concentrate on measuring the quality of life of either the patient or the carer alone. Although some researchers may be getting close conceptually, an instrument has yet to satisfy all the criteria necessary to become accepted as a gold standard for QOL assessment in dementing illness. The ideal instrument must show that it can reliably, reproducibly and comprehensively assess quality of life for patients with dementia and their carers. It should also demonstrate that it can measure quality of life effectively using a practical administration technique that does not place any unnecessary burden on either informal carers, other healthcare workers involved or the patient themselves. Further cross-sectional and longitudinal research is required to psychometrically test the available instruments as well as continuing conceptual research to explore new ways of assessing quality of life in this important area.
有许多方法可用于评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者或其他形式的痴呆患者。生活质量(QOL)评估在这些方法中独具特色,因为生活质量概念本身包含一个主观成分,这对其测量至关重要。可以说,在评估疾病及干预措施对痴呆的影响时,测量生活质量与测量疾病严重程度、疾病进展、症状反应、认知、行为障碍及日常生活活动同样重要。生活质量的主观性为医疗保健专业人员提供了将患者及其护理人员的价值体系纳入评估的机会。我们进行了一项系统综述,纳入已发表的数据(以及一些未发表的数据),这些数据涉及声称可测量痴呆患者生活质量的QOL评估工具和仪器。通过全面搜索计算机数据库(1980 - 1997年)来确定本综述的文献,这些数据库包括Medline、Embase、PsychLit和《国际药学文摘》。选择有关痴呆/AD中QOL工具的概念化、开发、验证、可靠性、可重复性、全面性、实用性及应用的报告进行综述,以及记录该治疗领域临床药物试验的论文。确定了文献中用于评估痴呆患者生活质量的一些措施或方法。决定将所得综述分为两部分呈现,这两部分分别对应工具分类的两个主要组。第一部分(第1部分)着眼于用于评估疾病影响的措施以及处于开发或测试阶段的工具。第二部分(第2部分)包括在记录药物对该治疗领域影响的研究中声称可测量生活质量的工具。目前尚无同时评估痴呆患者及其护理人员生活质量的经过验证的方法。这两组的QOL结果即使不是根本上也是紧密相关的,但本综述中确定的大多数研究仅专注于单独测量患者或护理人员的生活质量。尽管一些研究人员在概念上可能已接近目标,但尚无一种工具能满足被接受为痴呆疾病QOL评估金标准所需的所有标准。理想的工具必须表明它能够可靠、可重复且全面地评估痴呆患者及其护理人员的生活质量。它还应证明能够使用一种实用的管理技术有效测量生活质量,这种技术不会给非正式护理人员、其他参与的医疗保健工作者或患者本人带来任何不必要的负担。需要进一步开展横断面和纵向研究,以对现有工具进行心理测量测试,并持续进行概念研究,以探索在这一重要领域评估生活质量的新方法。