Suppr超能文献

[透析充分性的定量方法(第二部分)]

[Quantitative approach to dialysis adequacy (part two)].

作者信息

Stosović M

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Institute of Urology and Nephrology, Belgrade.

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1995 Mar-Apr;123(3-4):89-91.

Abstract

A quantitative assessment of dialysis and prescription of dialysis as therapy in every single patient have always been a continuous problem. Numerous efforts have been made to date to determine the kind of therapy for patients on hemodialysis on the basis of simple objective indices instead of clinical and laboratory parameters. Some of these indices have been widely accepted nowadays. Although the main clinical and laboratory parameters have still been currently applied in the assessment of peritoneal dialysis adequacy, serious quantitative approaches are made even in these cases regarding the more accurate therapy. The first part of the article deals with the development of quantitative approach to dialysis adequacy in certain models; the second part concerns dialysis prescription based on Gotch's and Sargent's modification of the American National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS) as well as on Direct dialysis quantification (DDQ) and peritoneal dialysis adequacy.

摘要

对每一位患者进行透析的定量评估以及将透析作为一种治疗方法进行处方,一直都是一个持续存在的问题。迄今为止,人们已经做出了许多努力,试图基于简单的客观指标而非临床和实验室参数来确定血液透析患者的治疗方式。如今,其中一些指标已被广泛接受。尽管目前主要的临床和实验室参数仍被用于评估腹膜透析充分性,但即便在这些情况下,为了实现更精确的治疗,也在采用严格的定量方法。本文的第一部分探讨了在某些模型中透析充分性定量方法的发展;第二部分涉及基于对美国国家合作透析研究(NCDS)的戈奇(Gotch)和萨金特(Sargent)改良法以及直接透析量化(DDQ)和腹膜透析充分性的透析处方。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验