• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母对新生儿复苏研究同意书的偏好:一项试点研究。

Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study.

作者信息

Culbert A, Davis D J

机构信息

Center for Clinical Education, Teilum, Afsnit 5404, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):721-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011247.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2004.011247
PMID:16319238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1734075/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Obtaining informed consent for resuscitation research, especially in the newborn, is problematic. This study aimed to evaluate parental preferences for hypothetical consent procedures in neonatal resuscitation research.

DESIGN

Mail-out survey questionnaire.

SETTING/ PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected parents who had received obstetrical or neonatal care at a tertiary perinatal centre.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Parental levels of comfort (Likert-type scale 1-6) regarding different methods of obtaining consent in hypothetical resuscitation research scenarios.

RESULTS

The response rate was 34%. The respondents were a group of highly educated women with a higher family income than would be expected in the general population. In terms of results, parents valued the impact the research would have on their baby and the importance of a positive interaction with the physicians conducting the research study. Parents felt most comfortable with prospective consent in the setting of prenatal classes or prenatal visits with a physician, but they were somewhat uncomfortable with prospective consent upon admission to hospital after labour had begun. Parents were uncomfortable with waived consent, deferred consent, and opting out, no matter when during the pregnancy consent was requested.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study reports parental preferences for prenatal information and consent for such research trials of neonatal resuscitation. A low response rate and potentially skewed demographics of the respondents prevent generalisability of this result. Interview studies should be performed to better determine parental preferences for informed consent in a more representative population.

摘要

目的

获取关于复苏研究的知情同意书,尤其是在新生儿中,存在问题。本研究旨在评估父母对于新生儿复苏研究中假设同意程序的偏好。

设计

邮寄调查问卷。

地点/参与者:在一家三级围产期中心接受过产科或新生儿护理的随机选择的父母。

主要观察指标

在假设的复苏研究场景中,父母对于不同获取同意方法的舒适度水平(李克特量表1 - 6)。

结果

回复率为34%。受访者是一群受过高等教育的女性,家庭收入高于一般人群预期。就结果而言,父母重视研究对其婴儿的影响以及与进行研究的医生积极互动的重要性。父母在产前课程或与医生进行产前检查时对前瞻性同意最感到舒适,但在分娩开始后入院时对前瞻性同意有些不舒服。无论在孕期何时请求同意,父母对豁免同意、延迟同意和选择退出都感到不舒服。

结论

这项试点研究报告了父母对于新生儿复苏此类研究试验的产前信息和同意的偏好。低回复率和受访者潜在的人口统计学偏差妨碍了该结果的普遍性。应进行访谈研究,以在更具代表性的人群中更好地确定父母对知情同意的偏好。

相似文献

1
Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study.父母对新生儿复苏研究同意书的偏好:一项试点研究。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):721-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011247.
2
Parental opinion of consent in neonatal research.父母对新生儿研究中同意书的意见。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F409-F414. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315289. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
3
Counseling pregnant women who may deliver extremely premature infants: medical care guidelines, family choices, and neonatal outcomes.为可能分娩极早产儿的孕妇提供咨询:医疗护理指南、家庭选择及新生儿结局
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2215.
4
International comparison of care for very low birth weight infants: parents' perceptions of counseling and decision-making.极低出生体重儿护理的国际比较:父母对咨询与决策的看法
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e263-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2274.
5
A paradigm for inpatient resuscitation research with an exception from informed consent.一种无需知情同意的住院患者复苏研究范例。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2567-75. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239115.76603.55.
6
Neonatal research and the validity of informed consent obtained in the perinatal period.新生儿研究与围产期获得的知情同意的有效性。
J Perinatol. 2004 Jul;24(7):409-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211142.
7
Perinatal loss and parental distress after the birth of a healthy infant.健康婴儿出生后的围产期损失与父母的悲痛
Adv Neonatal Care. 2007 Aug;7(4):200-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ANC.0000286337.90799.7d.
8
Epidural analgesia for labour: maternal knowledge, preferences and informed consent.分娩时的硬膜外镇痛:产妇的知识、偏好与知情同意
Ir Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;104(10):300-2.
9
The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population.提供唐氏综合征产前筛查的信息和知情决策:在非选择性人群中基于问卷和登记的调查。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun;87(3):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
Why persons choose to opt out of an exception from informed consent cardiac arrest trial.为什么有人选择退出知情同意豁免的心脏骤停试验。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):825-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Eligible Infants Included in Neonatal Clinical Trials and Reasons for Noninclusion: A Systematic Review.纳入新生儿临床试验的合格婴儿及未纳入原因:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2441372. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41372.
2
Video recording in the delivery room: current status, implications and implementation.产房视频记录:现状、影响及实施情况
Pediatr Res. 2024 Aug;96(3):610-615. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01865-0. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
3
Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents' and health professionals' views and experiences.简化的新生儿随机对照试验退出同意流程的挑战:父母和卫生专业人员的观点和经验的定性研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 May;106(3):244-250. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319545. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Waived Consent in Perinatal/Neonatal Research-When Is It Appropriate?围产期/新生儿研究中的豁免同意——何时适用?
Front Pediatr. 2019 Nov 26;7:493. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00493. eCollection 2019.
5
Waiver of Consent in a Trial Intervention Occurring at Birth-How Do Parents Feel?出生时进行试验性干预的同意书豁免——父母作何感受?
Front Pediatr. 2017 Mar 21;5:56. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00056. eCollection 2017.
6
Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.探讨在儿科复苏随机对照试验中,对同意的例外情况下替代决策人的体验:一项定性研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 13;6(9):e012931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012931.
7
The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research.关于早产儿或患病新生儿临床试验同意书的伦理问题:实证研究的系统评价(框架综合)
Trials. 2015 Nov 4;16:502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x.
8
Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: an integrated literature review.患有复杂疾病的婴幼儿的家长决策:一项综合文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Sep;51(9):1289-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
9
Mothers of babies enrolled in a randomized trial immediately after birth report a positive experience.在一项随机试验中,婴儿出生后随即参与试验的母亲们报告了积极的体验。
J Perinatol. 2014 Apr;34(4):280-3. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.183. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
10
Clinical trials in children.儿童临床试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;79(3):357-69. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12305.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate.确定窒息对新生儿脑损伤的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):276-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00194.x.
2
Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study.新生儿重症监护病房临床研究的同意书:一项回顾性调查和前瞻性研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jul;88(4):F280-5; discussion F285-6. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.4.f280.
3
Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study.获取新生儿随机对照试验的知情同意:Euricon研究中对家长和临床医生的访谈
Lancet. 2000 Dec 16;356(9247):2045-51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03401-2.
4
Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.
J Med Ethics. 2000 Aug;26(4):249-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.4.249.
5
Should Zelen pre-randomised consent designs be used in some neonatal trials?在某些新生儿试验中是否应采用泽伦预随机同意设计?
J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):325-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.4.325.
6
Conventional consent with opting in versus simplified consent with opting out: an exploratory trial for studies that do not increase patient risk.
J Pediatr. 1998 Apr;132(4):606-11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70347-6.
7
Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"?为新生儿随机对照试验获取知情同意——一种“繁琐的程序”?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 May;76(3):F143-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.3.f143.
8
Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent.临床医生的生物伦理学:1. 同意。
CMAJ. 1996 Jul 15;155(2):177-80.
9
Informed consent in emergency research. Consensus statement from the Coalition Conference of Acute Resuscitation and Critical Care Researchers.急诊研究中的知情同意。急性复苏与重症监护研究人员联盟会议的共识声明。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 26;273(16):1283-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.16.1283.
10
Obtaining parental consent--opting in or opting out?获得家长同意——选择加入还是选择退出?
Arch Dis Child. 1985 Oct;60(10):979-80. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.10.979.