Suppr超能文献

隐孢子虫感染:诊断技术

Cryptosporidium infection: diagnostic techniques.

作者信息

Magi Barbara, Canocchi Valentina, Tordini Giacinta, Cellesi Carla, Barberi Angela

机构信息

Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Parasitol Res. 2006 Jan;98(2):150-2. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0050-6. Epub 2005 Nov 18.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare a rapid immunological test and a PCR method with the conventional morphological technique for the identification of Cryptosporidium in faecal samples. Cryptosporidium was found in five samples by Kinyoun acid-fast stain. Five samples yielded positive results on immunoassay, three of which yielded negative results on microscopy. Thus, only two patients were positive for Cryptosporidium according to both methods. PCR analysis confirmed only one sample as positive. Non-homogeneous distribution of parasites in stool samples, lack of oocysts in the tested sample and antigenic diversity among Cryptosporidium species may explain the poor agreement among the three tests. Based on our experience, microscopy test with Kinyoun stain is the best and cheapest way to detect Cryptosporidium spp. in faecal samples. With this method, we have found a 5.4% prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in our area, similar to those reported for other regions of Italy and Europe.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较一种快速免疫检测法和一种聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法与传统形态学技术在粪便样本中隐孢子虫鉴定方面的效果。通过金胺-酚抗酸染色在5份样本中发现了隐孢子虫。5份样本免疫测定呈阳性结果,其中3份显微镜检查结果为阴性。因此,根据两种方法,只有2例患者隐孢子虫呈阳性。PCR分析仅确认1份样本为阳性。粪便样本中寄生虫分布不均一、检测样本中缺乏卵囊以及隐孢子虫物种间的抗原多样性可能解释了这三种检测方法之间一致性较差的原因。根据我们的经验,金胺-酚染色显微镜检查是检测粪便样本中隐孢子虫属的最佳且最便宜的方法。通过这种方法,我们发现本地区隐孢子虫感染率为5.4%,与意大利和欧洲其他地区报道的相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验