Suppr超能文献

腹内压在静态举重任务中对人体脊柱卸载及稳定的作用。

Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the unloading and stabilization of the human spine during static lifting tasks.

作者信息

Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15(8):1265-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0012-9. Epub 2005 Dec 7.

Abstract

The role of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in unloading the spine has remained controversial. In the current study, a novel kinematics-based approach along with a nonlinear finite-element model were iteratively used to calculate muscle forces, spinal loads, and stability margin under prescribed postures and loads measured in in vivo studies. Four coactivity levels (none, low, moderate, and high) of abdominal muscles (rectus abdominis, external oblique, and internal oblique) were considered concurrently with a raise in IAP from 0 to 4 kPa when lifting a load of 180 N in upright standing posture and to 9 kPa when lifting the same load in forward trunk flexions of 40 degrees and 65 degrees. For comparison, reference cases with neither abdominal coactivity nor IAP were investigated as well. A raise in IAP unloaded and stabilized the spine when no coactivity was considered in the foregoing abdominal muscles for all lifting tasks regardless of the posture considered. In the upright standing posture, the unloading action of IAP faded away even in the presence of low level of abdominal coactivity while its stabilizing action continued to improve as abdominal coactivity increased to moderate and high levels. For lifting in forward-flexed postures, the unloading action of IAP disappeared only with high level of abdominal coactivities while its stabilizing action deteriorated as abdominal coactivities increased. The unloading and stabilizing actions of IAP, hence, appear to be posture and task specific.

摘要

腹内压(IAP)在减轻脊柱负荷方面的作用一直存在争议。在当前研究中,一种基于运动学的新方法与非线性有限元模型被反复用于计算在体内研究中测量的规定姿势和负荷下的肌肉力量、脊柱负荷和稳定裕度。在直立站立姿势下提起180 N负荷时,同时考虑腹直肌、腹外斜肌和腹内斜肌的四种共同激活水平(无、低、中、高),IAP从0升高到4 kPa;在躯干前屈40度和65度提起相同负荷时,IAP升高到9 kPa。为作比较,还研究了既无腹部共同激活也无IAP的参考案例。对于所有提起任务,无论考虑何种姿势,在前述腹部肌肉不考虑共同激活的情况下,IAP升高可减轻脊柱负荷并使其稳定。在直立站立姿势下,即使存在低水平的腹部共同激活,IAP的减轻负荷作用也会消失,而随着腹部共同激活增加到中高水平,其稳定作用会持续改善。对于在前屈姿势下提起重物,只有在高水平的腹部共同激活时,IAP的减轻负荷作用才会消失,而随着腹部共同激活增加,其稳定作用会恶化。因此,IAP的减轻负荷和稳定作用似乎因姿势和任务而异。

相似文献

5
Relative efficiency of abdominal muscles in spine stability.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2008 Jun;11(3):291-9. doi: 10.1080/10255840802020404.
8
Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting.静态提举时腰椎姿势变化的生物力学
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2637-48. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000187907.02910.4f.

引用本文的文献

8
Urinary Incontinence in Competitive Women Weightlifters.竞技女性举重运动员的尿失禁。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Nov 1;36(11):3130-3135. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004052. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

本文引用的文献

10
The effects of breath control on intra-abdominal pressure during lifting tasks.举重任务中呼吸控制对腹内压的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):464-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000092368.90019.d8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验