McCann Susan E, Ambrosone Christine B, Moysich Kirsten B, Brasure John, Marshall James R, Freudenheim Jo L, Wilkinson Gregg S, Graham Saxon
Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Nutr Cancer. 2005;53(1):33-41. doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc5301_4.
A number of epidemiological studies have suggested that diet may affect the etiology of prostate cancer, but few have investigated the impact of phytochemical intakes on this cancer. We conducted a case-control study of diet and prostate cancer in western New York involving 433 men with primary, histologically confirmed prostate cancer and 538 population-based controls, frequency matched to cases on age and county of residence. Diet was assessed with a detailed food-frequency questionnaire. We calculated daily intakes of nutrients and the phytochemicals beta-sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, total phytosterols, total lignan precursors, quercetin, and kaempferol based on published food composition data. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) describing the association of prostate cancer risk with selected nutrients, phytochemicals, and food groups were estimated with unconditional logistic regression. Compared with men in the lowest quartile of intake, reduced risks were observed for men in the highest quartile of intake of vitamin C (OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33-0.74), beta-carotene (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.36-0.79), alpha-carotene (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.47-0.97), lutein (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.37-0.81), lycopene (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.42-0.92), total lignan precursors (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.47-0.94), quercetin (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.44-0.92), and total vegetables (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.36-0.79), but weak increased risks were observed for snacks and sweets (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.95-2.23). Estimates associated with nutrients and phytochemicals were attenuated after adjustment for total vegetable intake. Nevertheless, our results support the hypothesis that a phytochemical-rich, plant-based diet is of importance in reducing risks of hormone-related neoplasms.
多项流行病学研究表明,饮食可能会影响前列腺癌的病因,但很少有研究调查植物化学物质摄入量对这种癌症的影响。我们在纽约西部开展了一项饮食与前列腺癌的病例对照研究,涉及433名原发性、经组织学确诊的前列腺癌男性患者以及538名基于人群的对照者,对照者在年龄和居住县方面与病例进行了频率匹配。通过一份详细的食物频率问卷对饮食进行评估。我们根据已发表的食物成分数据计算了营养素以及植物化学物质β-谷甾醇、菜油甾醇、豆甾醇、总植物甾醇、总木脂素前体、槲皮素和山奈酚的每日摄入量。采用无条件逻辑回归估计了描述前列腺癌风险与选定营养素、植物化学物质及食物组之间关联的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。与摄入量处于最低四分位数的男性相比,摄入量处于最高四分位数的男性患前列腺癌风险降低,这些物质包括维生素C(OR = 0.49;95% CI = 0.33 - 0.74)、β-胡萝卜素(OR = 0.53;95% CI = 0.36 - 0.79)、α-胡萝卜素(OR = 0.67;95% CI = 0.47 - 0.97)、叶黄素(OR = 0.55;95% CI = 0.37 - 0.81)、番茄红素(OR = 0.62;95% CI = 0.42 - 0.92)、总木脂素前体(OR = 0.66;95% CI = 0.47 - 0.94)、槲皮素(OR = 0.64;95% CI = 0.44 - 0.92)以及总蔬菜(OR = 0.53;95% CI = 0.36 - 0.79),但零食和甜食的风险略有增加(OR = 1.46;95% CI = 0.95 - 2.23)。在对总蔬菜摄入量进行调整后,与营养素和植物化学物质相关的估计值有所减弱。尽管如此,我们的结果支持这样一种假设,即富含植物化学物质的植物性饮食对于降低激素相关肿瘤的风险具有重要意义。