Vergeer Ineke, Roberts Jenny
School of Applied Social Sciences, University of Durham, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2006 Feb;24(2):197-208. doi: 10.1080/02640410500131811.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of movement and stretching imagery on increases in flexibility. Thirty volunteers took part in a 4 week flexibility training programme. They were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) movement imagery, where participants imagined moving the limb they were stretching; (2) stretching imagery, where participants imagined the physiological processes involved in stretching the muscle; and (3) control, where participants did not engage in mental imagery. Active and passive range of motion around the hip was assessed before and after the programme. Participants provided specific ratings of vividness and comfort throughout the programme. Results showed significant increases in flexibility over time, but no differences between the three groups. A significant relationship was found, however, between improved flexibility and vividness ratings in the movement imagery group. Furthermore, both imagery groups scored significantly higher than the control group on levels of comfort, with the movement imagery group also scoring significantly higher than the stretching imagery group. We conclude that the imagery had stronger psychological than physiological effects, but that there is potential for enhancing physiological effects by maximizing imagery vividness, particularly for movement imagery.
本研究的目的是检验动作和拉伸意象对柔韧性提高的影响。30名志愿者参加了一个为期4周的柔韧性训练项目。他们被随机分为三组:(1)动作意象组,参与者想象自己正在移动正在伸展的肢体;(2)拉伸意象组,参与者想象拉伸肌肉时涉及的生理过程;(3)对照组,参与者不进行心理意象练习。在训练项目前后评估髋关节周围的主动和被动活动范围。参与者在整个项目中提供了关于生动性和舒适度的具体评分。结果显示,随着时间的推移,柔韧性显著提高,但三组之间没有差异。然而,在动作意象组中,发现柔韧性的提高与生动性评分之间存在显著关系。此外,两个意象组在舒适度水平上的得分均显著高于对照组,动作意象组的得分也显著高于拉伸意象组。我们得出结论,意象的心理效应比生理效应更强,但通过最大化意象的生动性,尤其是动作意象,有可能增强生理效应。