Suppr超能文献

用于青光眼功能损害分类的增强型青光眼分期系统(GSS 2)。

Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma.

作者信息

Brusini Paolo, Filacorda Stefano

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology--S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2006 Feb;15(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To introduce a new method, derived from the Glaucoma Staging System (GSS), for classifying glaucomatous visual field defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four sample groups composed respectively of 471 (sample #1), 128 (sample #2), 185 (sample #3), and 131 (sample #4) patients with either ocular hypertension or chronic glaucoma were considered. The GSS 2 uses both the MD and CPSD/CLV or PSD/LV perimetric indices to classify visual field defect in 6 stages and in 3 types (generalized, localized, and mixed). The formulas were determined using sample #1. A new borderline stage was created, on the basis of sample #2. The relationship between the PSD/LV and CPSD/CLV values was studied on sample #3 to verify the possibility of using the uncorrected indices instead of the CPSD/CLV. The relationship with other classification methods was studied on sample #4.

RESULTS

The GSS 2 showed a strong level of association with the AGIS and the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson methods in staging defect severity. A good correlation was also found with a classification based on the Bebie curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The GSS 2 was able to correctly classify both damage severity and perimetric defect type in the sample studied, using either the corrected or uncorrected visual field indices. It is a quick and easy method, and its formulas can be introduced in any software.

摘要

目的

介绍一种源自青光眼分期系统(GSS)的用于对青光眼性视野缺损进行分类的新方法。

患者与方法

考虑了分别由471例(样本#1)、128例(样本#2)、185例(样本#3)和131例(样本#4)患有高眼压症或慢性青光眼的患者组成的四个样本组。GSS 2使用平均缺损(MD)和矫正模式标准偏差/校正丢失方差(CPSD/CLV)或模式标准偏差/丢失方差(PSD/LV)视野指数将视野缺损分为6个阶段和3种类型(弥漫性、局限性和混合性)。这些公式是使用样本#1确定的。基于样本#2创建了一个新的临界阶段。在样本#3上研究了PSD/LV和CPSD/CLV值之间的关系,以验证使用未校正指数而非CPSD/CLV的可能性。在样本#4上研究了与其他分类方法的关系。

结果

在分期缺损严重程度方面,GSS 2与AGIS和霍达普-帕里什-安德森方法显示出高度相关性。与基于贝比曲线的分类也发现了良好的相关性。

结论

在研究的样本中,GSS 2能够使用校正或未校正的视野指数正确分类损伤严重程度和视野缺损类型。它是一种快速简便的方法,其公式可引入任何软件中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验