• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical and methodological issues in pedigree stroke research.家系中风研究中的伦理和方法学问题。
Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1242-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1242.
2
Privacy and confidentiality in the publication of pedigrees: a survey of investigators and biomedical journals.系谱发表中的隐私与保密:对研究者和生物医学期刊的一项调查
JAMA. 1998 Jun 10;279(22):1808-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.22.1808.
3
The impact of privacy protections on recruitment in a multicenter stroke genetics study.隐私保护对一项多中心卒中遗传学研究中招募工作的影响。
Neurology. 2005 Feb 22;64(4):721-4. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152042.07414.CC.
4
Ethical issues in bipolar disorders pedigree research: privacy concerns, informed consent, and grounds for waiver.双相情感障碍谱系研究中的伦理问题:隐私问题、知情同意及豁免理由。
Bipolar Disord. 2002 Feb;4(1):1-16. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-5618.2002.01155.x.
5
Ethical issues in couple and family research.伴侣与家庭研究中的伦理问题。
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):157-67. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.157.
6
Structuring the review of human genetics protocols: gene localization and identification studies.构建人类遗传学实验方案的综述:基因定位与鉴定研究
IRB. 1996 Jul-Aug;18(4):1-9.
7
Methodological and ethical considerations in designing an Internet study of quality of life: a discussion paper.设计一项关于生活质量的互联网研究中的方法学与伦理学考量:一篇讨论论文
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):394-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
8
Protecting the privacy of family members in survey and pedigree research.在调查和系谱研究中保护家庭成员的隐私。
JAMA. 2001 Jan 10;285(2):207-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.2.207.
9
Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review.利用互联网吸引家庭和儿童研究参与者的伦理问题:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204572. eCollection 2018.
10
Recruitment of Yoruba families from Nigeria for genetic research: experience from a multisite keloid study.从尼日利亚招募约鲁巴族家庭进行基因研究:一项多中心瘢痕疙瘩研究的经验
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Sep 2;15:65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming and being a biobank donor: The role of relationships and ethics.成为和成为生物银行捐赠者:关系和伦理的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0242828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242828. eCollection 2020.
2
Bio-repository of DNA in stroke: a study protocol of three ancestral populations.中风患者DNA生物样本库:三个祖先群体的研究方案
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jul 30;1(4):cvd.2012.012019. doi: 10.1258/cvd.2012.012019.
3
Genomic risk profiling of ischemic stroke: results of an international genome-wide association meta-analysis.缺血性脑卒中的基因组风险分析:一项国际全基因组关联荟萃分析的结果。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023161. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
4
Siblings with ischemic stroke study: results of a genome-wide scan for stroke loci.同胞缺血性中风研究:中风部位全基因组扫描结果。
Stroke. 2011 Oct;42(10):2726-32. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620484. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
5
Bio-Repository of DNA in stroke (BRAINS): a study protocol.脑卒中毒物基因组学生物样本库(BRAINS):一项研究方案。
BMC Med Genet. 2011 Mar 2;12:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-34.
6
Joint Commission primary stroke center certification does not affect proband enrollment: the siblings with ischemic stroke study.联合委员会初级卒中中心认证不影响先证者入组:缺血性卒中患者同胞研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009 Sep-Oct;18(5):363-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.01.005.
7
Personal privacy and public health: potential impacts of privacy legislation on health research in Canada.个人隐私与公共卫生:隐私立法对加拿大健康研究的潜在影响。
Can J Public Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;99(4):293-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03403758.
8
Impact of restricting enrollment in stroke genetics research to adults able to provide informed consent.将中风遗传学研究的招募对象限制为能够提供知情同意书的成年人的影响。
Stroke. 2008 Mar;39(3):831-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.494518. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
9
The Fangshan/Family-based Ischemic Stroke Study In China (FISSIC) protocol.中国房山区/基于家庭的缺血性中风研究(FISSIC)方案
BMC Med Genet. 2007 Sep 10;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-60.
10
The Siblings With Ischemic Stroke Study (SWISS): a progress report.缺血性中风患者同胞研究(SWISS):进展报告。
Clin Med Res. 2006 Mar;4(1):12-21. doi: 10.3121/cmr.4.1.12.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Role of primary care providers in the delivery of genetics services.初级保健提供者在提供遗传学服务中的作用。
Community Genet. 1998;1(1):18-22. doi: 10.1159/000016131.
3
HUGO Ethics Committee Statement on DNA sampling: control and access.人类基因组组织伦理委员会关于DNA采样的声明:管控与获取
Genetic Resour. 1998;11(2):43-4.
4
A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populations.针对弱势群体研究的科学伦理决策的关系视角。
IRB. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):1-4.
5
The Nuremberg Code.《纽伦堡法典》
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1691.
6
Protection of patients' rights to privacy.保护患者的隐私权。
BMJ. 1995 Nov 11;311(7015):1272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1272.
7
Ethics. Protecting communities in biomedical research.伦理学。在生物医学研究中保护社区。
Science. 2000 Aug 18;289(5482):1142-4. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5482.1142.
8
Association between the Glu298Asp polymorphism in the endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene and brain infarction. The GENIC Investigators.内皮型一氧化氮合酶基因Glu298Asp多态性与脑梗死之间的关联。GENIC研究人员。
Stroke. 2000 Jul;31(7):1634-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.7.1634.
9
Rules for research on human genetic variation--lessons from Iceland.人类基因变异研究规则——冰岛的经验教训
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 15;342(24):1830-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006153422412.
10
The Icelandic Healthcare Database and informed consent.冰岛医疗保健数据库与知情同意。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 15;342(24):1827-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006153422411.

家系中风研究中的伦理和方法学问题。

Ethical and methodological issues in pedigree stroke research.

作者信息

Worrall B B, Chen D T, Meschia J F

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1242-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1242.

DOI:10.1161/01.str.32.6.1242
PMID:11387482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2613840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a complex genetic disorder with a variable phenotype. Investigations of heritable factors in complex genetic disorders use pedigree and genetic techniques, which pose different ethical and methodological challenges than those routinely encountered in therapeutic research. Building consensus on acceptable research practices in this field is vital to the success of multicentered collaborations.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

We review important ethical and methodological concerns related to the collection, storage, and release of pedigree research information. The human studies aspects of pedigree research are complicated methodologically because individuals can be active or passive participants and pedigrees can be proband derived, partially validated, or fully validated. Current research ethics frameworks do not work well outside of a dyadic researcher-subject relationship. Privacy and confidentiality for family members must be considered in pedigree research. Investigators should anticipate potential conflicts of interest among family members when designing a pedigree research protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a "proband-initiated contact" methodology in which the proband or the proband's designate allows identification of potential families without breaching the privacy of individuals in the family. In situations in which family history data are collected without direct contact between researchers and individuals in the proband's family, an Institutional Review Board may waive consent by family members after appropriate review of the protocol and application of rules for granting waivers of consent. Certificates of Confidentiality should be considered.

摘要

背景

中风是一种具有可变表型的复杂遗传疾病。对复杂遗传疾病中遗传因素的研究使用系谱和遗传技术,这些技术带来了与治疗研究中常规遇到的不同的伦理和方法学挑战。就该领域可接受的研究实践达成共识对于多中心合作的成功至关重要。

综述总结

我们回顾了与系谱研究信息的收集、存储和发布相关的重要伦理和方法学问题。系谱研究的人体研究方面在方法上很复杂,因为个体可以是主动或被动参与者,并且系谱可以是先证者衍生的、部分验证的或完全验证的。当前的研究伦理框架在二元研究者 - 受试者关系之外效果不佳。在系谱研究中必须考虑家庭成员的隐私和保密问题。研究人员在设计系谱研究方案时应预见到家庭成员之间潜在的利益冲突。

结论

我们提出一种“先证者发起接触”的方法,其中先证者或先证者指定的人允许识别潜在家庭,而不会侵犯家庭中个人的隐私。在未在研究人员与先证者家庭中的个人之间进行直接接触的情况下收集家族史数据的情形中,机构审查委员会在对方案进行适当审查并应用给予同意豁免的规则后,可豁免家庭成员的同意。应考虑保密证书。