Suppr超能文献

在使用阿托品和普萘洛尔进行药理学阻断前后,对深呼吸和4秒运动的心率反应。

Heart rate responses to deep breathing and 4-seconds of exercise before and after pharmacological blockade with atropine and propranolol.

作者信息

Araujo C G, Nobrega A C, Castro C L

机构信息

Servico de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Auton Res. 1992 Feb;2(1):35-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01824209.

Abstract

Two autonomic tests which evaluate cardiac vagal activity, the respiratory sinus arrhythmia and the newer 4-second exercise test, have been compared. From electrocardiograph tracings, respiratory sinus arrhythmia was quantified by the ratio between the longest R-R interval during expiration and the shortest one during inspiration (E/I ratio), and the 4-second exercise test by the ratio between the last R-R interval before and the shortest one during exercise (B/C ratio). In 29 healthy subjects there was a correlation (R = 0.60, p less than 0.05) between the responses to the two tests. In a group of six healthy subjects the same tests were performed after autonomic blockade with intravenous atropine and/or propranolol. The heart rate rise during the 4-second exercise test was nearly abolished by atropine (mean +/- SD) (B/C: control = 1.53/0.33; after atropine = 1.04/0.03), whereas RSA was diminished to a lesser extent (E/I: control = 1.59/0.24; after atropine = 1.13/0.07). beta-adrenoceptor blockade did not affect the test ratios (after propranolol: B/C = 1.51/0.33 and E/I = 1.45/0.14). Successive tests during the following hour after atropine infusion showed a somewhat faster recovery of the respiratory sinus arrhythmia than the heart rate acceleration induced by the 4-second exercise test (p less than 0.05). We conclude that there may be some difference in the mechanisms which contribute to the heart rate changes in these two autonomic cardiovascular tests; these remain to be clarified. The 4-second exercise test may be an alternative to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia test in the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac parasympathetic activity.

摘要

对评估心脏迷走神经活动的两项自主神经测试——呼吸性窦性心律不齐和较新的4秒运动测试进行了比较。通过心电图描记,呼吸性窦性心律不齐通过呼气时最长R-R间期与吸气时最短R-R间期的比值(E/I比值)进行量化,4秒运动测试通过运动前最后一个R-R间期与运动时最短R-R间期的比值(B/C比值)进行量化。在29名健康受试者中,两项测试的反应之间存在相关性(R = 0.60,p < 0.05)。在一组6名健康受试者中,静脉注射阿托品和/或普萘洛尔进行自主神经阻滞之后进行了相同的测试。4秒运动测试期间的心率上升几乎被阿托品消除(平均值±标准差)(B/C:对照组 = 1.53/0.33;阿托品后 = 1.04/0.03),而呼吸性窦性心律不齐的降低程度较小(E/I:对照组 = 1.59/0.24;阿托品后 = 1.13/0.07)。β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞不影响测试比值(普萘洛尔后:B/C = 1.51/0.33,E/I = 1.45/0.14)。阿托品输注后接下来的一小时内进行的连续测试显示,呼吸性窦性心律不齐的恢复比4秒运动测试引起的心率加速稍快(p < 0.05)。我们得出结论,在这两项自主神经心血管测试中,导致心率变化的机制可能存在一些差异;这些差异仍有待阐明。在无创评估心脏副交感神经活动方面,4秒运动测试可能是呼吸性窦性心律不齐测试的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验