Gawronski Bertram, Hofmann Wilhelm, Wilbur Christopher J
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, Social Science Centre, London, Canada.
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):485-99. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
A widespread assumption in recent research on attitudes is that self-reported (explicit) evaluations reflect conscious attitudes, whereas indirectly assessed (implicit) evaluations reflect unconscious attitudes. The present article reviews the available evidence regarding unconscious features of indirectly assessed "implicit" attitudes. Distinguishing between three different aspects of attitudes, we conclude that (a) people sometimes lack conscious awareness of the origin of their attitudes, but that lack of source awareness is not a distinguishing feature of indirectly assessed versus self-reported attitudes, (b) there is no evidence that people lack conscious awareness of indirectly assessed attitudes per se, and (c) there is evidence showing that, under some conditions, indirectly assessed (but not self-reported) attitudes influence other psychological processes outside of conscious awareness. Implications for the concept of "implicit attitudes" are discussed.
近期关于态度的研究中一个普遍的假设是,自我报告(显性)评价反映有意识的态度,而间接评估(隐性)评价反映无意识的态度。本文回顾了有关间接评估“隐性”态度的无意识特征的现有证据。在区分态度的三个不同方面后,我们得出结论:(a)人们有时对自己态度的来源缺乏有意识的认识,但缺乏来源意识并非间接评估态度与自我报告态度的区别特征;(b)没有证据表明人们本身缺乏对间接评估态度的有意识认识;(c)有证据表明,在某些情况下,间接评估(而非自我报告)的态度会在意识之外影响其他心理过程。本文还讨论了对“隐性态度”概念的影响。