Suppr超能文献

将目标设定作为临床医生与其老年患者之间的一种共同决策策略。

Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients.

作者信息

Schulman-Green Dena J, Naik Aanand D, Bradley Elizabeth H, McCorkle Ruth, Bogardus Sidney T

机构信息

Yale University School of Nursing, 100 Church Street South, P.O. Box 9740, New Haven, CT 06536, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.010. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Older adults are less likely than other age groups to participate in clinical decision-making. To enhance participation, we sought to understand how older adults consider and discuss their life and health goals during the clinical encounter.

METHODS

We conducted six focus groups: four with community-dwelling older persons (n=42), one with geriatricians and internists (n=6), and one with rehabilitation nurses (n=5). Participants were asked to discuss: patients' life and health goals; communication about goals, and perception of agreement about health goals. Group interactions were tape-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

All participants were willing to discuss goals, but varied in the degree to which they did so. Reasons for non-discussion included that goal setting was not a priority given limited time, visits focused on symptoms, mutual perception of disinterest, and the presumption that all patients' goals were the same.

CONCLUSION

Interventions to enhance goal setting need to address key barriers to promoting goals discussions. Participants recognized the benefits of goal setting, however, training and instruments are needed to integrate goal setting into medicine.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Setting goals initially and reviewing them periodically may be a comprehensive, time-efficient way of integrating patients' goals into their care plans.

摘要

目的

与其他年龄组相比,老年人参与临床决策的可能性较小。为了提高参与度,我们试图了解老年人在临床诊疗过程中如何思考和讨论他们的生活及健康目标。

方法

我们开展了六个焦点小组:四个小组的参与者为社区居住的老年人(n = 42),一个小组的参与者为老年病医生和内科医生(n = 6),另一个小组的参与者为康复护士(n = 5)。参与者被要求讨论:患者的生活和健康目标;目标沟通以及对健康目标达成一致的看法。小组互动过程被录音、转录,并采用内容分析法进行分析。

结果

所有参与者都愿意讨论目标,但讨论的程度有所不同。不讨论的原因包括:由于时间有限,目标设定并非首要任务;就诊主要关注症状;双方都感觉对方不感兴趣;以及认为所有患者的目标都是相同的。

结论

旨在加强目标设定的干预措施需要解决促进目标讨论的关键障碍。参与者认识到目标设定的益处,然而,需要培训和工具将目标设定融入医学实践。

实践意义

最初设定目标并定期进行回顾,可能是将患者目标纳入其护理计划的一种全面且高效的方式。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Self-reported goals of older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病老年患者自我报告的目标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):306-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53119.x.
8
What do we treat patients for?我们治疗患者是为了什么?
Am J Med. 2001 Feb 1;110(2):151-2. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00707-5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验