Suppr超能文献

腰椎神经受累评估:磁共振成像、体格检查和疼痛图结果的一致性。

Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings.

机构信息

Center for Family and Community Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 10;11:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-202.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detection of nerve involvement originating in the spine is a primary concern in the assessment of spine symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the diagnostic method of choice for this detection. However, the agreement between MRI and other diagnostic methods for detecting nerve involvement has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this diagnostic study was to evaluate the agreement between nerve involvement visible in MRI and findings of nerve involvement detected in a structured physical examination and a simplified pain drawing.

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive patients referred for MRI of the lumbar spine were - without knowledge of MRI findings - assessed for nerve involvement with a simplified pain drawing and a structured physical examination. Agreement between findings was calculated as overall agreement, the p value for McNemar's exact test, specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

MRI-visible nerve involvement was significantly less common than, and showed weak agreement with, physical examination and pain drawing findings of nerve involvement in corresponding body segments. In spine segment L4-5, where most findings of nerve involvement were detected, the mean sensitivity of MRI-visible nerve involvement to a positive neurological test in the physical examination ranged from 16-37%. The mean specificity of MRI-visible nerve involvement in the same segment ranged from 61-77%. Positive and negative predictive values of MRI-visible nerve involvement in segment L4-5 ranged from 22-78% and 28-56% respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with long-standing nerve root symptoms referred for lumbar MRI, MRI-visible nerve involvement significantly underestimates the presence of nerve involvement detected by a physical examination and a pain drawing. A structured physical examination and a simplified pain drawing may reveal that many patients with "MRI-invisible" lumbar symptoms need treatment aimed at nerve involvement. Factors other than present MRI-visible nerve involvement may be responsible for findings of nerve involvement in the physical examination and the pain drawing.

摘要

背景

脊柱源性神经受累的检测是脊柱症状评估的首要关注点。磁共振成像(MRI)已成为该检测的首选诊断方法。然而,MRI 与其他神经受累检测方法的一致性尚未得到充分评估。本诊断研究旨在评估 MRI 可见神经受累与结构化体格检查和简化疼痛图中检测到的神经受累之间的一致性。

方法

61 例连续因腰椎 MRI 就诊的患者在不了解 MRI 结果的情况下,使用简化疼痛图和结构化体格检查评估神经受累情况。采用总体一致性、McNemar 精确检验的 p 值、特异性、敏感性以及阳性和阴性预测值来计算结果的一致性。

结果

MRI 可见神经受累明显比体格检查和相应节段疼痛图中的神经受累少见,且一致性较弱。在神经受累最常见的 L4-5 脊柱节段,MRI 可见神经受累的阳性神经系统检查的平均敏感性为 16%-37%。同一节段 MRI 可见神经受累的平均特异性为 61%-77%。L4-5 节段 MRI 可见神经受累的阳性和阴性预测值分别为 22%-78%和 28%-56%。

结论

在因长期神经根症状而接受腰椎 MRI 检查的患者中,MRI 可见神经受累明显低估了体格检查和疼痛图中检测到的神经受累的存在。结构化体格检查和简化疼痛图可能表明,许多患有“MRI 不可见”腰痛症状的患者需要针对神经受累的治疗。体格检查和疼痛图中神经受累的发现可能归因于除目前 MRI 可见神经受累以外的其他因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26fa/2944219/da5751506866/1471-2474-11-202-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验