Jüttner M, Wolf W
Institut für Medizinische Optik, Universität München, Federal Republic of Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(3):678-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00229892.
Saccadic latencies measured in response to a step-wise displacement of the target may be substantially reduced if a gap separates the offset of the initial fixation point and the onset of the peripheral target. According to Fischer and Ramsperger (1984) this paradigm provokes a bimodal latency distribution which consists of a peak of very fast saccadic responses (express saccades) at about 110 ms and another peak arising from somewhat slower saccades (regular saccades). Using again the gap paradigm, we investigated the effect of an additional go/no-go (i.e. target trial/catch trial) decision on saccadic latencies. The experiments yielded the following results: (i) the distribution between the peaks of express and regular saccades strongly depends on the proportion of catch trials introduced into the trial sequence, which suggests the existence of different modes of operation of the decision processes for express and regular saccades. (ii) The catch trial effect on saccadic latency proved to be a local phenomenon in time: saccades which follow catch trials tend to be slower than those following target trials.
如果在初始注视点的偏移与外周目标的起始之间存在一个间隙,那么针对目标的逐步位移所测量的扫视潜伏期可能会大幅缩短。根据菲舍尔和拉姆施佩格(1984年)的研究,这种范式会引发一种双峰潜伏期分布,其中包括在大约110毫秒时出现的非常快速的扫视反应(快速扫视)峰值,以及由稍慢一些的扫视(常规扫视)产生的另一个峰值。再次使用间隙范式,我们研究了额外的“执行/不执行”(即目标试验/捕捉试验)决策对扫视潜伏期的影响。实验得出了以下结果:(i)快速扫视和常规扫视峰值之间的分布强烈依赖于引入试验序列中的捕捉试验比例,这表明快速扫视和常规扫视的决策过程存在不同的操作模式。(ii)捕捉试验对扫视潜伏期的影响被证明是一个局部的时间现象:跟随捕捉试验的扫视往往比跟随目标试验的扫视更慢。