Suppr超能文献

补骨脂素-紫外线A与窄谱紫外线B光疗治疗白癜风的比较

Psoralen-ultraviolet A vs. narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy for the treatment of vitiligo.

作者信息

Parsad D, Kanwar A J, Kumar B

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Feb;20(2):175-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01413.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although many treatment modalities have been tried for the treatment of vitiligo, none is uniformly effective. Psoralen phototherapy (psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA)) is established as efficacious treatment for vitiligo. Recently, narrow-band UVB (NBUVB) has been reported to be an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with vitiligo.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of PUVA and NBUVB in the treatment of vitiligo.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective analysis of 69 patients with vitiligo who were treated either with PUVA or NBUVB at the pigmentary clinic of the Dermatology Department of the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The following variables were compared between the two groups of patients: repigmentation status, number of treatments for marked to complete repigmentation in existing lesions, appearance of new lesions or increase in size of existing lesions, adverse effect of therapy, stability of repigmentation and colour match.

RESULTS

In PUVA-treated group, 9 patients showed marked to complete repigmentation (23.6%) and 14 patients showed moderate improvement (36.8%), whereas in NBUVB-treated group, 13 patients showed marked to complete repigmentation (41.9%) and 10 patients showed moderate improvement (32.2%). A statistically significantly better stability and colour match of repigmentation with surrounding skin was seen in NBUVB-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

We showed that NBUVB is more effective than PUVA and repigmentation induced with NBUVB is statistically significantly more stable.

摘要

背景

尽管已经尝试了多种治疗白癜风的方法,但没有一种方法是普遍有效的。补骨脂素光疗(补骨脂素紫外线A(PUVA))已被确立为治疗白癜风的有效方法。最近,窄谱中波紫外线(NBUVB)已被报道是白癜风患者一种有效且安全的治疗选择。

目的

比较PUVA和NBUVB治疗白癜风的疗效。

设计与地点

对印度昌迪加尔医学教育与研究研究生院皮肤科色素门诊69例接受PUVA或NBUVB治疗的白癜风患者进行回顾性分析。

观察指标

比较两组患者的以下变量:色素再生状况、现有皮损从明显色素脱失到完全色素再生所需的治疗次数、新皮损的出现或现有皮损大小的增加、治疗的不良反应、色素再生的稳定性和颜色匹配度。

结果

在接受PUVA治疗的组中,9例患者显示明显至完全色素再生(23.6%),14例患者显示中度改善(36.8%);而在接受NBUVB治疗的组中,13例患者显示明显至完全色素再生(41.9%),10例患者显示中度改善(32.2%)。在接受NBUVB治疗的患者中,色素再生与周围皮肤的稳定性和颜色匹配度在统计学上明显更好。

结论

我们表明NBUVB比PUVA更有效,且NBUVB诱导的色素再生在统计学上明显更稳定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验