Suppr超能文献

重度痴呆老年人的疼痛:行为疼痛评估工具的系统评价

Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: a systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools.

作者信息

Zwakhalen Sandra M G, Hamers Jan P H, Abu-Saad Huda Huijer, Berger Martijn P F

机构信息

Department of Health Care Studies, Universiteit Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2006 Jan 27;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-6-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain is a common and major problem among nursing home residents. The prevalence of pain in elderly nursing home people is 40-80%, showing that they are at great risk of experiencing pain. Since assessment of pain is an important step towards the treatment of pain, there is a need for manageable, valid and reliable tools to assess pain in elderly people with dementia.

METHODS

This systematic review identifies pain assessment scales for elderly people with severe dementia and evaluates the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these instruments. Relevant publications in English, German, French or Dutch, from 1988 to 2005, were identified by means of an extensive search strategy in Medline, Psychinfo and CINAHL, supplemented by screening citations and references. Quality judgement criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine publications reporting on behavioural pain assessment instruments were selected for this review. Twelve observational pain assessment scales (DOLOPLUS2; ECPA; ECS; Observational Pain Behavior Tool; CNPI; PACSLAC; PAINAD; PADE; RaPID; Abbey Pain Scale; NOPPAIN; Pain assessment scale for use with cognitively impaired adults) were identified. Findings indicate that most observational scales are under development and show moderate psychometric qualities.

CONCLUSION

Based on the psychometric qualities and criteria regarding sensitivity and clinical utility, we conclude that PACSLAC and DOLOPLUS2 are the most appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability and clinical utility.

摘要

背景

疼痛是养老院居民中常见且主要的问题。老年养老院人群中疼痛的患病率为40%-80%,表明他们遭受疼痛的风险很大。由于疼痛评估是疼痛治疗的重要一步,因此需要便于使用、有效且可靠的工具来评估老年痴呆患者的疼痛。

方法

本系统评价确定了用于重度痴呆老年人的疼痛评估量表,并评估了这些工具的心理测量特性和临床效用。通过在Medline、Psychinfo和CINAHL中广泛的检索策略,并辅以筛选引文和参考文献,确定了1988年至2005年期间以英文、德文、法文或荷兰文发表的相关出版物。制定了质量判断标准并用于评估量表的心理测量方面。

结果

本评价选择了29篇报告行为疼痛评估工具的出版物。确定了12种观察性疼痛评估量表(DOLOPLUS2;ECPA;ECS;观察性疼痛行为工具;CNPI;PACSLAC;PAINAD;PADE;RaPID;阿比疼痛量表;NOPPAIN;用于认知障碍成年人的疼痛评估量表)。研究结果表明,大多数观察性量表尚在开发中,心理测量质量中等。

结论

基于心理测量质量以及关于敏感性和临床效用的标准,我们得出结论,PACSLAC和DOLOPLUS2是目前最适用的量表。进一步的研究应集中于通过进一步测试其有效性、可靠性和临床效用,来改进这些量表。

相似文献

3
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.基于算法的养老院痴呆患者疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Recent developments in pain in dementia.痴呆症疼痛方面的最新进展
BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):461-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7489.461.
2
Pain assessment and cognitive impairment: part 2.疼痛评估与认知障碍:第2部分。
Nurs Stand. 2004;19(13):33-40. doi: 10.7748/ns2004.12.19.13.33.c3773.
3
Pain assessment and cognitive impairment: part 1.疼痛评估与认知障碍:第1部分。
Nurs Stand. 2004;19(12):39-42. doi: 10.7748/ns2004.12.19.12.39.c3769.
4
The challenges of pain measurement in critically ill young children: a comprehensive review.
Aust Crit Care. 2004 Feb;17(1):33-45. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(05)80048-7.
9
Pain assessment in patients with possible vascular dementia.
Psychiatry. 2003 Summer;66(2):133-45. doi: 10.1521/psyc.66.2.133.20618.
10
The development and testing of the PATCOA to assess pain in confused older adults.
Pain Manag Nurs. 2003 Jun;4(2):77-86. doi: 10.1016/s1524-9042(02)54209-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验