Zwakhalen Sandra M G, Hamers Jan P H, Abu-Saad Huda Huijer, Berger Martijn P F
Department of Health Care Studies, Universiteit Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr. 2006 Jan 27;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-6-3.
Pain is a common and major problem among nursing home residents. The prevalence of pain in elderly nursing home people is 40-80%, showing that they are at great risk of experiencing pain. Since assessment of pain is an important step towards the treatment of pain, there is a need for manageable, valid and reliable tools to assess pain in elderly people with dementia.
This systematic review identifies pain assessment scales for elderly people with severe dementia and evaluates the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these instruments. Relevant publications in English, German, French or Dutch, from 1988 to 2005, were identified by means of an extensive search strategy in Medline, Psychinfo and CINAHL, supplemented by screening citations and references. Quality judgement criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales.
Twenty-nine publications reporting on behavioural pain assessment instruments were selected for this review. Twelve observational pain assessment scales (DOLOPLUS2; ECPA; ECS; Observational Pain Behavior Tool; CNPI; PACSLAC; PAINAD; PADE; RaPID; Abbey Pain Scale; NOPPAIN; Pain assessment scale for use with cognitively impaired adults) were identified. Findings indicate that most observational scales are under development and show moderate psychometric qualities.
Based on the psychometric qualities and criteria regarding sensitivity and clinical utility, we conclude that PACSLAC and DOLOPLUS2 are the most appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability and clinical utility.
疼痛是养老院居民中常见且主要的问题。老年养老院人群中疼痛的患病率为40%-80%,表明他们遭受疼痛的风险很大。由于疼痛评估是疼痛治疗的重要一步,因此需要便于使用、有效且可靠的工具来评估老年痴呆患者的疼痛。
本系统评价确定了用于重度痴呆老年人的疼痛评估量表,并评估了这些工具的心理测量特性和临床效用。通过在Medline、Psychinfo和CINAHL中广泛的检索策略,并辅以筛选引文和参考文献,确定了1988年至2005年期间以英文、德文、法文或荷兰文发表的相关出版物。制定了质量判断标准并用于评估量表的心理测量方面。
本评价选择了29篇报告行为疼痛评估工具的出版物。确定了12种观察性疼痛评估量表(DOLOPLUS2;ECPA;ECS;观察性疼痛行为工具;CNPI;PACSLAC;PAINAD;PADE;RaPID;阿比疼痛量表;NOPPAIN;用于认知障碍成年人的疼痛评估量表)。研究结果表明,大多数观察性量表尚在开发中,心理测量质量中等。
基于心理测量质量以及关于敏感性和临床效用的标准,我们得出结论,PACSLAC和DOLOPLUS2是目前最适用的量表。进一步的研究应集中于通过进一步测试其有效性、可靠性和临床效用,来改进这些量表。