• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管下段结石的前瞻性研究

Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

作者信息

Honeck P, Häcker A, Alken P, Michel M S, Knoll T

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mannheim University Hospital, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Urol Res. 2006 Jun;34(3):190-2. doi: 10.1007/s00240-006-0041-9. Epub 2006 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-006-0041-9
PMID:16446978
Abstract

We performed a prospective, non-randomised study to determine the appropriate first-line treatment modality for distal ureteral stones. Between 2003 and 2004, a total of 124 patients with distal ureteral calculi were entered into the study (mean age 48 years, 35 women and 99 men). Sixty-two patients were treated with shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and 62 patients with ureteroscopy (URS). The average stone size was 6.9 mm (3-33 mm) for SWL and 7.2 mm (3-30 mm) for URS. The treatment decision depended on the patients' preference and clinical parameters (i.e. contraindications for anaesthesia). URS was performed under general anaesthesia, using semirigid 8 Fr instruments. SWL was performed under analgo-sedation using a Modulith SLX. Of patients treated with SWL, 84% had a treatment success within 7 days, 98% after URS. These results show a significant success (P=0.005) in favour of URS. The average in-patient stay after SWL was 3 days and for URS 4 days (not significant). The results show a high efficacy and a low complication rate for both modalities. The attained stone-free rate shows a significant advantage for primary URS.

摘要

我们进行了一项前瞻性、非随机研究,以确定输尿管下段结石合适的一线治疗方式。在2003年至2004年期间,共有124例输尿管下段结石患者纳入本研究(平均年龄48岁,女性35例,男性99例)。62例患者接受了冲击波碎石术(SWL),62例患者接受了输尿管镜检查(URS)。SWL组结石平均大小为6.9 mm(3 - 33 mm),URS组为7.2 mm(3 - 30 mm)。治疗决策取决于患者的偏好和临床参数(即麻醉禁忌证)。URS在全身麻醉下进行,使用半硬性8 Fr器械。SWL在镇痛镇静下使用Modulith SLX进行。接受SWL治疗的患者中,84%在7天内治疗成功,URS组为98%。这些结果显示URS具有显著优势(P = 0.005)。SWL后的平均住院时间为3天,URS为4天(无显著差异)。结果显示两种治疗方式均具有高疗效和低并发症发生率。首次URS获得的无石率显示出显著优势。

相似文献

1
Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管下段结石的前瞻性研究
Urol Res. 2006 Jun;34(3):190-2. doi: 10.1007/s00240-006-0041-9. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
2
A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.一项比较冲击波碎石术和半刚性输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石的前瞻性随机研究。
Urology. 2009 Dec;74(6):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
3
Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石(<20mm):一项配对对照研究
Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
4
Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.体内或体外冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石?结石大小和数量对成功率的影响。
J Endourol. 1998 Aug;12(4):307-12. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.307.
5
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
6
Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.总表面积影响冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石的无石结局。
J Endourol. 2019 Aug;33(8):661-666. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0120. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
7
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的前瞻性比较。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 5;51(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01460-4.
8
Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.中段及下段输尿管结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术还是输尿管镜检查?一项多中心研究的结果
J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):727-33. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.727.
9
Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.比较半刚性输尿管镜、软性输尿管镜和冲击波碎石术治疗 11-20mm 近端输尿管结石的初始治疗效果。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020 Apr 6;92(1):39-44. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2020.1.39.
10
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 1999 Nov;36(5):376-9. doi: 10.1159/000020017.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的前瞻性比较。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 5;51(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01460-4.
2
Ureteroscopy with conscious sedation for distal ureteric calculi: 10-year experience.清醒镇静下输尿管镜治疗输尿管下段结石:10年经验
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1-2):E12-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3302. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies.输尿管结石的管理:问题与争议
BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95 Suppl 2:85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05206.x.
2
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
3
In vitro comparison of fragmentation efficiency of flexible pneumatic lithotripsy using 2 flexible ureteroscopes.使用2种软性输尿管镜对软性气压弹道碎石术的碎石效率进行体外比较。
选择体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石的理由。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Oct;43(5):387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0818-9. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.关于如何进行体外冲击波碎石术以达到最大效果的各个方面。
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):433-46. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0485-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone.以坐骨大孔和坐骨小孔作为仰卧位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的路径。
Urol Res. 2010 Dec;38(6):417-20. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0285-2. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
6
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性、大型、近端输尿管结石的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Apr;24(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70118-9.
7
Noninvasive management of obstructing ureteral stones using electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.使用电磁体外冲击波碎石术对梗阻性输尿管结石进行无创治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1339-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9766-6. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
8
[Ureterorenoscopy: yesterday, today, tomorrow].[输尿管肾镜检查:过去、现在与未来]
Urologe A. 2006 Sep;45 Suppl 4:185-6. doi: 10.1007/s00120-006-1183-7.
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):967-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000134380.68368.38.
4
Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complications.输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石后输尿管支架置入:一项评估症状和并发症的前瞻性随机研究
BJU Int. 2004 May;93(7):1032-4; discussion 1034-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.4776a.x.
5
Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice.输尿管镜检查:技术与技巧对临床实践的影响
J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):99-102. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000070883.44091.24.
6
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones.用于治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)
Eur Urol. 2003 May;43(5):552-5. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00086-1.
7
Ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: an emerging definitive management strategy for symptomatic ureteral calculi in pregnancy.输尿管镜检查与钬激光碎石术:一种用于治疗妊娠期有症状输尿管结石的新兴确定性治疗策略。
Urology. 2002 Sep;60(3):383-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01751-x.
8
Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress?尿石症的当前治疗:进步还是退步?
J Endourol. 2002 Jun;16(5):281-8. doi: 10.1089/089277902760102758.
9
Safety and efficacy of holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses.钬激光碎石术在出血性疾病患者中的安全性和有效性。
J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):442-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64654-x.
10
Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis.输尿管结石的管理:成本比较与决策分析
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1621-9.