• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)

Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones.

作者信息

Tligui M, El Khadime M R, Tchala K, Haab F, Traxer O, Gattegno B, Thibault P

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2003 May;43(5):552-5. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00086-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00086-1
PMID:12706002
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate emergency treatment of obstructing ureteral stones by in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) during acute renal colic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1994 to February 2000, 200 patients (mean age: 42 years) were treated by ESWL (EDAP LT-02) for obstructing ureteral stones causing acute renal colic refractory to medical treatment or recurring within 24hours of such treatment. Stones were visualised by fluoroscopic imaging and/or ultrasound. Follow-up included radiological and/or ultrasound examinations and lasted three months.

RESULTS

Mean stone size was 7mm (3-20mm). At three months, 164/200 (82%) patients were stone-free. This rate ranged from 79% to 83% according to the location of the stone, and from 75% to 86% according to the size of the stone. These differences in rate were not significant. Two or three ESWL sessions were required in 79 patients. ESWL was well tolerated in 90% of patients. The only complication was a case of pyelonephritis requiring the placement of a JJ stent, administration of antibiotics, and distant ureteroscopy. The 36 patients, in whom ESWL failed, underwent ureteroscopy (n=23) or lithotripsy with a Dornier machine (n=13).

CONCLUSION

Non-deferred ESWL for acute renal colic secondary to obstructing ureteral stones has a satisfactory success rate and very low morbidity.

摘要

目的

评估在急性肾绞痛期间通过原位体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的急诊治疗效果。

患者与方法

1994年1月至2000年2月,200例患者(平均年龄:42岁)接受了ESWL(EDAP LT - 02)治疗,这些患者的输尿管梗阻性结石导致急性肾绞痛,药物治疗无效或在治疗后24小时内复发。通过荧光透视成像和/或超声对结石进行显影。随访包括放射学和/或超声检查,持续三个月。

结果

结石平均大小为7mm(3 - 20mm)。三个月时,164/200(82%)的患者结石清除。根据结石位置,该比率在79%至83%之间;根据结石大小,该比率在75%至86%之间。这些比率差异不显著。79例患者需要进行两到三次ESWL治疗。90%的患者对ESWL耐受性良好。唯一的并发症是一例肾盂肾炎,需要放置双J支架、使用抗生素以及进行远端输尿管镜检查。ESWL治疗失败的36例患者接受了输尿管镜检查(n = 23)或使用多尼尔机器进行碎石术(n = 13)。

结论

对于输尿管梗阻性结石继发的急性肾绞痛,不延迟进行ESWL治疗具有令人满意的成功率和极低的发病率。

相似文献

1
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones.用于治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)
Eur Urol. 2003 May;43(5):552-5. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00086-1.
2
Evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones.急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻性结石的评估
Int Braz J Urol. 2008 Jul-Aug;34(4):433-40; discussion 441-2. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000400005.
3
In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones with acute renal colic.原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗伴有急性肾绞痛的输尿管梗阻性结石。
J Urol. 1992 Dec;148(6):1786-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37029-5.
4
In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic due to obstructing ureteral stones.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1997 Apr;31(2):137-9. doi: 10.3109/00365599709070318.
5
Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.急诊与延迟碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻结石:荟萃分析比较研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
[In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones causing acute renal failure].原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗致急性肾衰竭的输尿管结石
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1994 Apr;40(4):291-4.
7
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 1999 Nov;36(5):376-9. doi: 10.1159/000020017.
8
[Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].[冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石——单机构661例连续病例经验]
Harefuah. 2005 Sep;144(9):605-8, 680, 679.
9
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A study on feasibility and efficacy in stone clearance and reducing morbidity in ureteric and renal stones with colic.急诊体外冲击波碎石术:研究其在缓解输尿管和肾结石绞痛方面的结石清除率和降低发病率的可行性和疗效。
Urologia. 2023 Aug;90(3):516-521. doi: 10.1177/03915603221140444. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones using the Dornier lithotriptor MFL5000.使用多尼尔MFL5000碎石机进行体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石
Urol Int. 1994;52(2):98-101. doi: 10.1159/000282582.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study.早期体外冲击波碎石术治疗 5 至 10 毫米上段输尿管结石的疗效:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e39103. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039103.
2
Primary Definitive Treatment versus Ureteric Stenting in the Management of Acute Ureteric Colic: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.急性输尿管绞痛治疗中初始确定性治疗与输尿管支架置入术的成本效益分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 27;12(11):1773. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111773.
3
Functional and morphological recovery of solitary kidneys after drainage. Double J stent placement vs emergency ureteroscopy: which one is reasonable?
引流后孤立肾的功能和形态恢复。双 J 支架放置与急诊输尿管镜检查:哪一种更合理?
Urolithiasis. 2018 Oct;46(5):479-484. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1005-y. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
4
Factors predicting success of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL) in ureteric calculi--a single centre experience from the United Kingdom (UK).预测急诊体外冲击波碎石术(eESWL)治疗输尿管结石成功的因素——来自英国(UK)的单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Oct;41(5):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0580-9. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
5
Usefulness of early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in colic patients with ureteral stones.早期体外冲击波碎石术在输尿管结石绞痛患者中的应用价值
Korean J Urol. 2012 Dec;53(12):853-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.853. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
6
Modern management of stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney.孤立肾患者结石病的现代管理
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012 Mar;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.25641. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
7
Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study.输尿管结石的即刻或延迟体外冲击波碎石术:一项前瞻性随机研究
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):739-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
8
Urgent shock wave lithotripsy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 570 patients.紧急冲击波碎石术作为输尿管结石的一线治疗方法:对570例患者的荟萃分析
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):725-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0484-0. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone.以坐骨大孔和坐骨小孔作为仰卧位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的路径。
Urol Res. 2010 Dec;38(6):417-20. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0285-2. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
10
Emergency management of ureteral stones: Recent advances.输尿管结石的急诊处理:最新进展
Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct;24(4):461-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.44248.