Farmer Tracy, Robinson Kerry, Elliott Susan J, Eyles John
Canadian Heart Health Dissemination Project at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):377-94. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285708.
In this article, the authors present an empirical example of triangulation in qualitative health research. The Canadian Heart Health Dissemination Project (CHHDP) involves a national examination of capacity building and dissemination undertaken within a series of provincial dissemination projects. The Project's focus is on the context, processes, and impacts of health promotion capacity building and dissemination. The authors collected qualitative data within a parallel-case study design using key informant interviews as well as document analysis. Given the range of qualitative data sets used, it is essential to triangulate the data to address completeness, convergence, and dissonance of key themes. Although one finds no shortage of admonitions in the literature that it must be done, there is little guidance with respect to operationalizing a triangulation process. Consequently, the authors are feeling their way through the process, using this opportunity to develop, implement, and reflect on a triangulation protocol.
在本文中,作者展示了定性健康研究中三角互证法的一个实证例子。加拿大心脏健康传播项目(CHHDP)涉及对一系列省级传播项目中开展的能力建设和传播进行全国性考察。该项目的重点是健康促进能力建设和传播的背景、过程及影响。作者在平行案例研究设计中,通过关键信息人访谈和文件分析收集了定性数据。鉴于所使用的定性数据集范围广泛,对数据进行三角互证以处理关键主题的完整性、趋同性和不一致性至关重要。尽管在文献中不乏关于必须进行三角互证的告诫,但在实施三角互证过程方面几乎没有指导。因此,作者们正在摸索这个过程,利用这个机会来制定、实施和反思一个三角互证方案。