研究治理：伦理问题。
Research governance: ethical issues.
作者信息
Slowther Anne, Boynton Petra, Shaw Sara
机构信息
Ethox Centre Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2006 Feb;99(2):65-72. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900218.
Abstract
Healthcare research is haunted by a history of unethical studies in which profound harm was caused to vulnerable individuals. Official systems for gaining ethical approval for research, designed to prevent a repetition of these shameful examples, can prove bureaucratic and inflexible in practice. The core ethical principles of respect for autonomy, prevention of harm, promotion of benefit, and justice (which form the basis of professional codes of research conduct) must be applied flexibly to take account of contextual, methodological, personal and practical considerations. Ensuring that the design and conduct of all research is ethically sound is the responsibility of all involved-including researchers, research institutions, ethics review committees and regulatory bodies.
摘要
医疗保健研究一直笼罩在不道德研究的历史阴影之下，在这些研究中，弱势群体遭受了巨大伤害。旨在防止此类可耻事件再次发生的官方研究伦理审批制度，在实际操作中可能会显得官僚主义且缺乏灵活性。尊重自主性、预防伤害、促进受益和公正等核心伦理原则（这些原则构成了研究行为专业准则的基础）必须灵活应用，以考虑到背景、方法、个人和实际等方面的因素。确保所有研究的设计和实施在伦理上站得住脚，是所有相关方的责任，包括研究人员、研究机构、伦理审查委员会和监管机构。
相似文献
1
Research governance: ethical issues.研究治理：伦理问题。
J R Soc Med. 2006 Feb;99(2):65-72. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900218.
2
Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.程序与过程：伦理范式与定性研究的实施。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Sep 27;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-25.
3
Ethical and epistemological insights: a case study of participatory action research with young people.伦理与认识论见解：一项针对年轻人的参与式行动研究的案例分析
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Apr;7(2):20-33. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.20.
4
How ethical is ethical research? Recruiting marginalized, vulnerable groups into health services research.符合伦理的研究有多符合伦理？将边缘化、弱势群体纳入卫生服务研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(2):248-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04567.x.
5
Ethical issues surrounding studies with vulnerable populations: a case study of South African street children.涉及弱势群体研究的伦理问题：以南非街头儿童为例的研究
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2007 Apr-Jun;19(2):117-26. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2007.19.2.117.
6
The ethical basis of psychiatric research: conceptual issues and empirical findings.精神病学研究的伦理基础：概念问题与实证发现。
Compr Psychiatry. 1998 May-Jun;39(3):99-110. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(98)90068-2.
7
Ethical issues in adolescent consent for research.青少年参与研究同意过程中的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Sep;10(5):504-11. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne632oa.
8
Does peer benefit justify research on incompetent individuals? The same-population condition in codes of research ethics.同行受益能否成为对无行为能力个体进行研究的正当理由？研究伦理准则中的同群体条件。
Med Health Care Philos. 2012 Aug;15(3):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9324-1.
9
Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.伦理批准、质量保证与爱管闲事的编辑
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1398-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01918.x.
10
Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.重新审视医疗保健研究中的“伦理”与“质量”：迭代伦理范式之实例
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0004-1.
引用本文的文献
1
Organizational arrangements as a key to enhancing innovativeness and efficiency - analysis of a restructuring hospital in Finland.组织安排作为提高创新性和效率的关键——芬兰一家改组医院的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08376-6.
2
Outsourcing Transcription: Extending Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research.外包转录：延伸定性研究中的伦理考量。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Jun;32(7):1197-1204. doi: 10.1177/10497323221101709. Epub 2022 May 21.
3
Letter in Reply: A Promising Intervention for Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Asthma COPD Overlap Syndrome.回复信：一种针对哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征综合肺康复的有前景的干预措施。
Oman Med J. 2021 Jan 31;36(1):e234. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.15. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Qualitative exploration of patient flow in a Caribbean emergency department.加勒比海地区某急诊科患者流程的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e041422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041422.
5
Research skills and the data spreadsheet: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries.研究技能与数据电子表格：低收入和中等收入国家研究入门指南
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 2):S140-S144. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
6
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.提高生物医学研究监管和管理的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):176-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
Effects of cinnamon granules on pharmacokinetics of berberine in Rhizoma Coptidis granules in healthy male volunteers.肉桂颗粒对健康男性志愿者黄连颗粒中小檗碱药代动力学的影响。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2011 Jun;31(3):379-383. doi: 10.1007/s11596-011-0385-4. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
8
The OPERA trial: protocol for a randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential and nursing accommodation.OPERA 试验：一项针对居住在住宅和护理院的老年人的运动干预的随机试验方案。
Trials. 2011 Feb 2;12:27. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-27.
9
The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study.卫生部的研究治理框架仍然是多中心研究的一个障碍：一项全国性描述性研究的结果
J R Soc Med. 2007 May;100(5):234-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000513.
10
Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey.临床试验的研究治理障碍：一项回顾性调查。
J R Soc Med. 2007 Feb;100(2):101-4. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000227.
本文引用的文献
1
Personal Safety in Dangerous Places.危险场所中的个人安全。
J Contemp Ethnogr. 1992;21(3):343-374. doi: 10.1177/089124192021003003.
2
Research governance: where did it come from, what does it mean?研究治理：它从何而来，意味着什么？
J R Soc Med. 2005 Nov;98(11):496-502. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801110.
3
The informed consent process in a cross-cultural setting: is the process achieving the intended result?跨文化背景下的知情同意过程：该过程是否达成了预期效果？
Ethn Dis. 2005 Spring;15(2):300-4.
4
Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast.低收入环境下的知情同意理解：来自肯尼亚海岸的三个案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(12):2547-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.037.
5
A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance.关于患者与医疗保健专业人员之间药物沟通的研究系统评价：对一致性的影响。
Health Expect. 2004 Sep;7(3):235-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00281.x.
6
Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders.罕见遗传病研究的伦理审查。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 31;329(7460):288-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.288.
7
Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto.学术健康科学中心的更好治理：超越多伦多的奥利维耶里/阿波泰克斯事件。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Feb;30(1):25-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005181.
8
Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information.修改后的知情同意程序：同意推迟提供信息。
BMJ. 2003 Aug 2;327(7409):284-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284.
9
Does research into sensitive areas do harm? Experiences of research participation after a child's diagnosis with Ewing's sarcoma.对敏感领域的研究是否有害？儿童被诊断为尤因肉瘤后的研究参与经历。
Med J Aust. 2002 Nov 4;177(9):507-10. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04921.x.
10
Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.为何我们不应寻求个体对参与卫生服务研究的知情同意。
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):313-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.313.
Zotero 插件