• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与癌症临床试验的障碍:对患者报告因素的荟萃分析和系统评价

Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors.

作者信息

Mills Edward J, Seely Dugald, Rachlis Beth, Griffith Lauren, Wu Ping, Wilson Kumanan, Ellis Peter, Wright James R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2006 Feb;7(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9
PMID:16455478
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enrolling participants onto clinical trials of cancer presents an important challenge. We aimed to identify the concerns of patients with cancer about, and the barriers to, participation in clinical trials.

METHODS

We did a systematic review to assess studies of barriers to participation in experimental trials and randomised trials for validity and content. We estimated the frequency with which patients identified particular issues by pooling across studies that presented data for barriers to participation in clinical trials as proportions.

FINDINGS

We analysed 12 qualitative studies (n=722) and 21 quantitative studies (n=5452). Two qualitative studies inquired of patients who were currently enrolled onto clinical trials, and ten inquired of patients who were eligible for enrolment onto various clinical trials. Barriers to participation in clinical trials were protocol-related, patient-related, or physician-related. The most common reasons cited as barriers included: concerns with the trial setting; a dislike of randomisation; general discomfort with the research process; complexity and stringency of the protocol; presence of a placebo or no-treatment group; potential side-effects; being unaware of trial opportunities; the idea that clinical trials are not appropriate for serious diseases; fear that trial involvement would have a negative effect on the relationship with their physician; and their physician's attitudes towards the trial. Meta-analysis confirmed the findings of our systematic review.

INTERPRETATION

The identification of such barriers to the participation in clinical trials should help trialists to develop strategies that will keep to a maximum participation and cooperation in cancer trials, while informing and protecting prospective participants adequately.

摘要

背景

招募参与者参加癌症临床试验是一项重大挑战。我们旨在确定癌症患者对参与临床试验的担忧以及参与的障碍。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估关于参与实验性试验和随机试验的障碍的研究的有效性和内容。我们通过汇总那些将参与临床试验的障碍数据以比例形式呈现的研究,来估计患者指出特定问题的频率。

结果

我们分析了12项定性研究(n = 722)和21项定量研究(n = 5452)。两项定性研究询问了目前已参加临床试验的患者,十项研究询问了有资格参加各种临床试验的患者。参与临床试验的障碍与方案相关、与患者相关或与医生相关。被提及最多的障碍原因包括:对试验环境的担忧;不喜欢随机分组;对研究过程普遍感到不适;方案的复杂性和严格性;存在安慰剂或无治疗组;潜在的副作用;不知道有试验机会;认为临床试验不适用于严重疾病;担心参与试验会对与医生的关系产生负面影响;以及医生对试验的态度。荟萃分析证实了我们系统评价的结果。

解读

识别这些参与临床试验的障碍应有助于试验者制定策略,以最大限度地提高癌症试验中的参与率和合作率,同时充分告知并保护潜在参与者。

相似文献

1
Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors.参与癌症临床试验的障碍:对患者报告因素的荟萃分析和系统评价
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Feb;7(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
4
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings.预防和减少一般医院环境中老年人身体约束使用的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD012476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012476.pub2.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in long-term care.为长期护理中的痴呆症患者改善心理社会状况而量身定制的活动。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2(2):CD009812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009812.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.个体层面的干预措施以减少个人接触室外空气污染及其对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD013441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013441.pub2.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Reality Interventions of Daily Versus Weekly Data Collection in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Cancer: Pilot Survey Study.成人癌症患者自我报告结局中每日与每周数据收集的虚拟现实干预:试点调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 29;9:e73506. doi: 10.2196/73506.
2
Providing brief information on clinical trials in appropriate formats may improve impressions and willingness to participate among socioeconomically disadvantaged people in France.以适当的形式提供关于临床试验的简要信息,可能会改善法国社会经济弱势群体对其的印象以及参与意愿。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0329288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329288. eCollection 2025.
3
Why do patients take part in research? An updated overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.
患者为何参与研究?心理社会障碍与促进因素的系统评价最新综述。
Trials. 2025 May 27;26(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08850-6.
4
NRG Oncology Assessment of Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Treatment Planning in Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials: Present and Future.NRG肿瘤学对人工智能在放射治疗临床试验自动治疗计划中的评估:现状与未来。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.045.
5
Building a diverse national research advisory board.建立一个多元化的国家研究咨询委员会。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 9;9(1):e32. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.1169. eCollection 2025.
6
Sex Differences in the Participation in Secondary Prevention Stroke Studies.二级预防中风研究参与情况中的性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e038917. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038917. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
7
Knowledge and understanding of information after taking decision to participate or not in a randomized trial of surgery vs radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced prostate cancer - an observational study.在决定是否参与局部晚期前列腺癌患者手术与放疗随机试验后对信息的知晓与理解——一项观察性研究。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jan 28;64:167-172. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218.
8
Which variables are associated with recruitment failure? A nationwide review on obstetrical and gynaecological multicentre RCTs (2003-2023).哪些变量与招募失败相关?一项关于妇产科多中心随机对照试验的全国性综述(2003 - 2023年)。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e087766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087766.
9
"The Truth Is, We Must Miss Some": A Qualitative Study of the Patient Eligibility Screening Process, and Automation Perspectives, for Cancer Clinical Trials.“事实是,我们必定会有所遗漏”:一项关于癌症临床试验患者资格筛选过程及自动化前景的定性研究
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(23):e70466. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70466.
10
Informed consent and risk communication challenges in antimicrobial clinical trials: a scoping review.知情同意和风险沟通在抗菌药物临床试验中的挑战:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 24;14(11):e082096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082096.