Stoakes Luba, Reyes Romina, Daniel Janis, Lennox Gwen, John Michael A, Lannigan Robert, Hussain Zafar
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, London Health Sciences Centre, Room E3-316, Westminster Tower, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Feb;44(2):637-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.637-639.2006.
MRSASelect agar was compared to CHROMagar, mannitol-salt agar with oxacillin, and mannitol-salt agar with cefoxitin (MSA-CFOX) for the isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The sensitivities and specificities were 97.3% and 99.8%, 82.9% and 99.1%, 80.2% and 79%, and 99.1% and 84.8%, respectively. MSA-CFOX and MRSASelect had a high sensitivity. MRSASelect, however, was more specific and proved to be a more reliable and rapid medium for the detection of MRSA.
将MRSASelect琼脂与CHROMagar、含苯唑西林的甘露醇盐琼脂以及含头孢西丁的甘露醇盐琼脂（MSA - CFOX）进行比较，以分离耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌（MRSA）。其敏感性和特异性分别为97.3%和99.8%、82.9%和99.1%、80.2%和79%、99.1%和84.8%。MSA - CFOX和MRSASelect具有较高的敏感性。然而，MRSASelect更具特异性，并且被证明是一种检测MRSA更可靠、快速的培养基。
