Suppr超能文献

眼压计与感染风险:是神话还是现实?不同消毒方案对眼压计探头的效果。

Tonometers and infectious risk: myth or reality? Efficacy of different disinfection regimens on tonometer tips.

作者信息

Cillino S, Casuccio A, Giammanco G M, Mammina C, Morreale D, Di Pace F, Lodato G

机构信息

Dipartimento di Neurologia, Oftalmologia, Otorinolaringoiatria e Psichiatria, Sezione di Oftalmologia, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2007 Apr;21(4):541-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702269. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the adequacy of common disinfection regimens for disposable tonometer tips and assess if disinfection of reusable prisms or the use of disposable tips is preferable.

METHODS

We used disposable tonometer tips, using the same material and tip diameter of standard Goldmann tonometer prism. Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilisand Candida albicanswere tested according to the European standard guidelines for disinfectants test. Antimicrobial effectiveness of the following disinfection practices has been assessed: dry wipe, Minuten wipes (Alpro), soaking in 3% hydrogen peroxide, 0.5% benzalkonium chloride, and 0.5% Pantasept for 1, 5, and 15 min. All tests have been performed three times and all conditions tested in duplicate.

RESULTS

Dry wiping and 1 min soak in 3% hydrogen peroxide were ineffective on all microrganisms. Minuten wipes, 1 min soak in 0.5% benzalkonium chloride or 3% hydrogen peroxide were ineffective on B. subtilis. 0.5% Pantasept soak was effective in 1 min for all microrganisms tested, whereas 3% hydrogen peroxide and 0.5% benzalkonium chloride soaks were effective when performed for at least 5 min. B. subtiliswas the most resistant organism to disinfectant regimes at 1 min time.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of our study demonstrate a relative disinfection efficacy for the different evaluated regimens, provided that correct exposure times are adopted for the chosen disinfectants, a condition difficult to ensure in a busy clinic setting. We conclude that disposable prism tonometry provides a safe alternative to Goldmann tonometry.

摘要

目的

评估一次性眼压计探头常用消毒方案的充分性,并评估可重复使用棱镜的消毒或一次性探头的使用哪种更可取。

方法

我们使用了一次性眼压计探头,其材料和尖端直径与标准戈德曼眼压计棱镜相同。根据欧洲消毒剂测试标准指南,对铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、枯草芽孢杆菌和白色念珠菌菌株进行了测试。评估了以下消毒方法的抗菌效果:干擦、使用Minuten擦拭巾(Alpro)、浸泡在3%过氧化氢、0.5%苯扎氯铵和0.5%潘他西普中1、5和15分钟。所有测试均进行了三次,所有测试条件均进行了重复测试。

结果

干擦和在3%过氧化氢中浸泡1分钟对所有微生物均无效。使用Minuten擦拭巾、在0.5%苯扎氯铵或3%过氧化氢中浸泡1分钟对枯草芽孢杆菌无效。0.5%潘他西普浸泡1分钟对所有测试微生物均有效,而3%过氧化氢和0.5%苯扎氯铵浸泡至少5分钟才有效。枯草芽孢杆菌在1分钟时是对消毒方案最具抗性的微生物。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,只要为所选消毒剂采用正确的暴露时间,不同评估方案具有相对消毒效果,但在繁忙的临床环境中难以确保这一条件。我们得出结论,一次性棱镜眼压测量法是戈德曼眼压测量法的一种安全替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验