Garweg J, Böhnke M, Stellbrink H J
Augenklinik Universität, Hamburg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1991;88(1):44-8.
In 28 cases of cytomegalovirus retinitis being treated with ganciclovir we examined the relative value of planimetry and conventional investigative methods, such as visual field examination and serial fundus photographs in determination of the development of retinitis. Planimetric evaluation was not possible in 11 of the 28 cases because of technical problems inherent in the method. In 17 cases we found no correlation between visual acuity, visual field and area of retinal necrosis evaluated by planimetry. This shows the low value of visual acuity tests and planimetric evaluation of routine fundus photographs in the examination of the development of common retinitis. In selected cases with primary visual acuity of less than 1/10 (e.g., in optic nerve involvement) the planimetry of fundus photographs seems to yield more information than the standard ophthalmological routine examinations.
在28例接受更昔洛韦治疗的巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎患者中，我们研究了平面测量法与传统检查方法（如视野检查和系列眼底照片）在确定视网膜炎进展方面的相对价值。由于该方法存在的技术问题，28例中有11例无法进行平面测量评估。在17例患者中，我们发现视力、视野与通过平面测量法评估的视网膜坏死面积之间没有相关性。这表明视力测试和常规眼底照片的平面测量评估在普通视网膜炎进展检查中的价值较低。在选定的初始视力低于1/10的病例中（例如，视神经受累时），眼底照片的平面测量法似乎比标准眼科常规检查能提供更多信息。
