Daly Edward J, Bonfiglio Christine M, Mattson Tara, Persampieri Michael, Foreman-Yates Kristin
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Educational Psychology, Nebraska 68588, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):485-97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.113-04.
Experimental analyses for improving reading fluency deficits have rarely targeted generalized increases in academic responding. As a consequence, the variables that may help students to generalize newly learned forms of academic responding like reading are not well understood. Furthermore, experimental analyses of reading fluency interventions have not systematically examined difficulty level as a variable that may affect instructional outcomes. The experiment reported in this paper expands (a) the measurement of the dependent variables to include generalized increases across tasks (reading passages) and (b) the combination of independent variables used to produce measurable generalized increases. The results demonstrate the importance of combining reward and instructional variables (including difficulty level) to produce generalized increases and how those variables can be meaningfully investigated prior to making treatment recommendations.
改善阅读流畅性缺陷的实验分析很少针对学术反应的普遍提高。因此,对于可能帮助学生将新学的学术反应形式(如阅读)进行泛化的变量,我们还了解得不够充分。此外,阅读流畅性干预的实验分析尚未系统地将难度水平作为一个可能影响教学效果的变量来进行研究。本文所报告的实验扩展了:(a) 因变量的测量范围,将跨任务(阅读段落)的普遍提高纳入其中;(b) 用于产生可测量的普遍提高的自变量组合。结果表明,将奖励和教学变量(包括难度水平)相结合以实现普遍提高的重要性,以及在提出治疗建议之前如何有意义地研究这些变量。