• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy.三种干预措施提高口语阅读表现的比较:教学层次的应用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):459-69. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-459.
2
The effects of instructional match and content overlap on generalized reading performance.教学匹配和内容重叠对广义阅读表现的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):507-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-507.
3
Examining the maintenance and generalization effects of repeated practice: A comparison of three interventions.考察重复练习的维持和泛化效果:三种干预措施的比较。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Jun;68:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
The Effects of Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency for Students With Reading Disabilities.重复阅读对阅读障碍学生阅读流畅性的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Mar/Apr;50(2):213-224. doi: 10.1177/0022219415605194. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
A comparison of the effects of reading interventions on engagement and performance for fourth-grade students with learning disabilities.针对四年级学习障碍学生,阅读干预对其参与度和表现影响的比较。
Behav Modif. 2015 Jan;39(1):167-90. doi: 10.1177/0145445514561316. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Effects of word overlap on generalized gains from a repeated readings intervention.词重叠对重复阅读干预的广义收益的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Jun;74:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
An experimental analysis of reading interventions: generalization across instructional strategies, time, and passages.阅读干预的实验分析:跨教学策略、时间和篇章的泛化
J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Spring;37(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-111.
8
Investigating the benefit of adding listening passage preview to repeated readings.研究在重复阅读中增加听力段落预读的益处。
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Sep;33(3):439-447. doi: 10.1037/spq0000227. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
9
Measurement scale influences in the evaluation of sight-word reading interventions.测量尺度对sight-word 阅读干预评估的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):360-79. doi: 10.1002/jaba.126. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
10
Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities.同伴介导的语音技能与阅读理解项目对有阅读障碍的中学生阅读技能习得的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;38(5):424-33. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380050501.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Colored Overlays on Reading Fluency in Individuals with Dyslexia.彩色叠加对阅读障碍者阅读流畅性的影响。
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Aug 12;9(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0079-7. eCollection 2016 Sep.
2
A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers.针对中学阅读困难学生的流利度干预措施综述
Read Writ. 2008 Jun;21(4):317-347. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7.
3
A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading.两种闪卡法提高单词阅读能力的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):781-92. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781.
4
A synthesis of read-aloud interventions on early reading outcomes among preschool through third graders at risk for reading difficulties.大声朗读干预对有阅读困难风险的学龄前至三年级儿童早期阅读成果的综合影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;44(3):258-75. doi: 10.1177/0022219410378444.
5
Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: a synthesis of 20 years of research.小学高年级阅读困难学生的阅读干预措施:20年研究综述
Read Writ. 2010;23(8):889-912. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5.
6
A Synthesis of Reading Interventions and Effects on Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Older Struggling Readers.针对年长阅读困难读者的阅读干预措施及其对阅读理解结果影响的综述
Rev Educ Res. 2009 Mar 1;79(1):262-300. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325998.
7
Three versus six rereadings of practice passages.练习文章三遍与六遍重读。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):375-80. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-375.
8
Improving reading outcomes for children with learning disabilities: using brief experimental analysis to develop parent-tutoring interventions.改善学习障碍儿童的阅读成果:运用简短实验分析来开发家长辅导干预措施。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):203-21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.105-05.
9
Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: part II. Use of brief experimental analysis to evaluate reading fluency treatments.完善学术技能缺陷的实验分析:第二部分。运用简短实验分析评估阅读流畅性治疗方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Fall;39(3):323-31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.13-05.
10
Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part I. An investigation of variables that affect generalized oral reading performance.完善学术技能缺陷的实验分析:第一部分。对影响广义口头阅读表现的变量的调查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):485-97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.113-04.

本文引用的文献

1
Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.应用行为分析的一些当前维度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.
2
Relative effects of whole-word and phonetic-prompt error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.全词与语音提示纠错对发育障碍学生视觉词习得与保持的相对影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):99-110. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-99.
3
Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.纠错过程中主动学生反应对发育障碍学生视觉词习得、保持和泛化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):111-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-111.
4
Teacher use of descriptive analysis data to implement interventions to decrease students' problem behaviors.教师运用描述性分析数据来实施干预措施,以减少学生的问题行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):227-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-227.
5
Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges.运用基于评估的课程干预来改善一名有情绪和行为问题学生的课堂行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;27(1):7-19. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-7.
6
Antecedent control of oral reading errors and self-corrections by mentally retarded children.智障儿童对口头阅读错误和自我纠正的先行控制。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Spring;17(1):111-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-111.
7
The effects of two prepractice procedures on oral reading.两种练习前程序对口语阅读的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 1984 Nov;17(9):544-8. doi: 10.1177/002221948401700908.
8
Effects of a taped-words treatment on reading proficiency.单词录音治疗对阅读能力的影响。
Except Child. 1989 Jan;55(4):321-5. doi: 10.1177/001440298905500406.
9
Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior.自我伤害性逃避行为的实验分析与消退
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):11-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11.
10
Effects of two error-correction procedures on oral reading errors. Word supply versus sentence repeat.两种纠错程序对口头阅读错误的影响。单词提供与句子重复。
Behav Modif. 1990 Apr;14(2):188-99. doi: 10.1177/01454455900142005.

三种干预措施提高口语阅读表现的比较:教学层次的应用。

A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy.

机构信息

Syracuse City School District.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):459-69. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-459.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-459
PMID:16795833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1297827/
Abstract

The instructional hierarchy is a behavior-analytic model that links level of academic skill development (i.e., acquisition, fluency, generalization, adaptation) with appropriate instructional techniques. The present study used the instructional hierarchy to compare the effects of three instructional interventions (listening passage preview, subject passage preview, and taped words) on subjects' oral reading performance on word lists and passages. Subjects were 4 male students with learning disabilities who ranged in age from 8 years 10 months to 11 years 11 months. A multielement design was used to compare the effects of the three interventions to each other and to baseline. Results indicated that the listening passage preview intervention (which contained modeling, drill, and generalization components) produced the largest performance gains. The implications of these results for selecting academic interventions based on the instructional hierarchy are discussed.

摘要

教学层次结构是一种行为分析模型,它将学术技能发展水平(即获取、流利度、泛化、适应)与适当的教学技术联系起来。本研究使用教学层次结构来比较三种教学干预措施(听力篇章预览、主题篇章预览和录音单词)对被试在单词列表和篇章上的口语阅读表现的影响。被试为 4 名年龄在 8 岁 10 个月至 11 岁 11 个月之间的学习障碍男性学生。采用多元素设计来比较三种干预措施之间以及与基线的效果。结果表明,听力篇章预览干预(包含示范、练习和泛化成分)产生了最大的表现收益。这些结果对于根据教学层次结构选择学术干预措施的意义进行了讨论。