Robert Rebecca C, Gittelsohn Joel, Creed-Kanashiro Hilary M, Penny Mary E, Caulfield Laura E, Narro M Rocio, Black Robert E
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Nutr. 2006 Mar;136(3):634-41. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.3.634.
Process evaluation was used to explain the success of a randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention to improve the feeding behaviors of caregivers and the nutritional status of infants in Trujillo, Peru. Health personnel delivered a multicomponent intervention within the environment of usual care at government health centers. We created a model of the expected intervention pathway to successful outcomes. Process data were then collected on health center implementation of the intervention and caregiver reception to it. Using multivariate models, we found that variables of health center implementation, caregiver exposure, and caregiver message recall were all significant determinants in the pathway leading to improved feeding behaviors. These outcomes were consistent with our original intervention model. Further support for our model arose from the differences in caregiver reception between intervention and control centers. Process data allowed us to characterize the pathway through which an effective nutrition intervention operated. This study underscores the importance of including process evaluation, which will lead to the development and implementation of more effective nutrition interventions.
过程评估用于解释在秘鲁特鲁希略开展的一项教育干预随机对照试验的成功之处,该试验旨在改善照顾者的喂养行为以及婴儿的营养状况。卫生人员在政府卫生中心的常规护理环境中实施了一项多组分干预措施。我们构建了一个通向成功结果的预期干预路径模型。随后收集了关于卫生中心干预措施实施情况以及照顾者接受程度的过程数据。通过多变量模型,我们发现卫生中心实施情况、照顾者接触程度以及照顾者信息回忆等变量都是导致喂养行为改善路径中的重要决定因素。这些结果与我们最初的干预模型一致。干预中心与对照中心在照顾者接受程度上的差异进一步支持了我们的模型。过程数据使我们能够描述有效营养干预措施的运作路径。本研究强调了纳入过程评估的重要性,这将有助于开发和实施更有效的营养干预措施。