Chik Z, Johnston A, Tucker A T, Chew S L, Michaels L, Alam C A S
Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts, and the Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;61(3):275-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02542.x.
The Transdermal Delivery System (TDS) is a liquid formulation that can be applied to the skin via a metered pump spray to deliver drug to the systemic circulation. The aims of this study were to assess the ability of the TDS preparation to deliver testosterone systemically, and to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of the hormone in healthy males.
An open label, comparative, randomized placebo controlled study involving three treatments and three periods with a minimum of a 1 week washout period was conducted. Twelve healthy males received 50 mg TDS-testosterone, TDS-placebo, and 50 mg of a commercially available topical testosterone preparation (Androgel, 1% topical testosterone gel).
The mean AUC(0,12 h) was higher following application of TDS-testosterone (61.8 ng ml-1 h), compared with Androgel (57.7 ng ml-1 h) and TDS-placebo (50.7 ng ml-1 h. The mean Cmax (0,12 h) was similar for TDS-testosterone (6.6 ng ml-1) and Androgel (6.5 ng ml-1) and these values were higher than those for TDS-placebo (5.7 ng ml-1). Analysis of variance showed that the 90% confidence intervals on the relative difference of the ratio for the AUC(0,12 h) and the Cmax (0,12 h) between TDS-testosterone and Androgel, were contained within the bioequivalence limit (80, 125%) (Cmax 89.2, 112.3% and AUC 93.5, 120.5%). Serum testosterone concentrations were lower following TDS-Placebo and were not bioequivalent either to the gel or spray.
The TDS preparation was shown to deliver testosterone systemically to humans and the concentrations of the hormone in the 12 h following TDS administration were bioequivalent to an existing topical delivery gel.
透皮给药系统(TDS)是一种液体制剂,可通过定量泵喷雾应用于皮肤,以将药物输送到体循环。本研究的目的是评估TDS制剂全身递送睾酮的能力,并描绘该激素在健康男性中的药代动力学特征。
进行了一项开放标签、比较性、随机安慰剂对照研究,涉及三种治疗和三个阶段,最少有1周的洗脱期。12名健康男性接受了50毫克TDS-睾酮、TDS-安慰剂以及50毫克市售外用睾酮制剂(Androgel,1%外用睾酮凝胶)。
与Androgel(57.7纳克·毫升⁻¹·小时)和TDS-安慰剂(50.7纳克·毫升⁻¹·小时)相比,应用TDS-睾酮后平均AUC(0,12小时)更高(61.8纳克·毫升⁻¹·小时)。TDS-睾酮(6.6纳克·毫升⁻¹)和Androgel(6.5纳克·毫升⁻¹)的平均Cmax(0,12小时)相似,且这些值高于TDS-安慰剂(5.7纳克·毫升⁻¹)。方差分析表明,TDS-睾酮与Androgel之间AUC(0,12小时)和Cmax(0,12小时)比值的相对差异的90%置信区间在生物等效性限度(80%,125%)内(Cmax为89.2%,112.3%;AUC为93.5%,120.5%)。TDS-安慰剂给药后血清睾酮浓度较低,且与凝胶或喷雾均无生物等效性。
TDS制剂被证明可将睾酮全身递送至人体,且TDS给药后12小时内该激素的浓度与现有的外用递送凝胶具有生物等效性。