Weems Carl F, Silverman Wendy K
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2006 Apr;91(2-3):113-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.01.009. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
Theorists and investigators have emphasized an important role for control in emotional problems such as anxiety and anxiety disorders in youth. However, the term "control" is subject to theoretical ambiguities because of the broad conceptual bases for the term. In this article, we examine the concepts of locus of control, learned helplessness/attributional style, self-efficacy, and perceived control to develop an integrative model of control based on research and theory. The review emphasizes each of the theories distinguishing features in order to show how these distinctive features relate to real versus perceived control and how they may be differentially associated with childhood anxiety. We attempt to clarify the various definitions of control and the implications of these various definitions with respect to childhood anxiety, its disorders and their treatment and present a model of control that is integrative but also addresses the complexities of the different definitions of control (i.e., is multifaceted). The model developed from our review of the literature postulates that individuals differ in the extent to which they actually have control and differ, also on a continuum, in their perceptions of control. The need for this integrative model is highlighted by methodological, developmental, and clinical considerations. In particular, research has operationalized control and related constructs such as emotion regulation in ways that may be confounding actual control and perceived control. The need for an integrative but also multifaceted conceptualization of the role of control in childhood anxiety is also highlighted by clinical and developmental considerations. For instance, different facets of control may have differential relevance to clinical anxiety and at different points in childhood.
理论家和研究者强调了控制在青少年焦虑及焦虑症等情绪问题中所起的重要作用。然而,由于“控制”一词的概念基础广泛,该术语存在理论上的模糊性。在本文中,我们考察了控制点、习得性无助/归因风格、自我效能感和感知控制等概念,以基于研究和理论构建一个综合性的控制模型。本综述强调了每种理论的独特特征,以展示这些独特特征如何与实际控制和感知控制相关,以及它们如何可能与儿童焦虑存在不同的关联。我们试图阐明控制的各种定义,以及这些不同定义对儿童焦虑、其障碍及其治疗的影响,并提出一个综合性的控制模型,该模型既能解决控制不同定义的复杂性(即具有多面性)。我们通过对文献的综述得出的模型假定,个体在实际拥有控制的程度上存在差异,在对控制的感知上也在一个连续体上存在差异。方法学、发展学和临床方面的考虑凸显了这种综合模型的必要性。特别是,研究在操作控制及相关构念(如情绪调节)时,可能混淆了实际控制和感知控制。临床和发展学方面的考虑也凸显了对控制在儿童焦虑中作用进行综合且多面概念化的必要性。例如,控制的不同方面可能与临床焦虑在不同的儿童时期具有不同的相关性。