Sigston Elizabeth, de Mones Erwan, Babin Emmanuel, Hans Stéphane, Hartl Dana M, Clement Philippe, Brasnu Daniel F
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Feb;132(2):147-52. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.2.147.
To assess local control of early-stage glottic cancer by laser cordectomy in comparison with previously published external partial laryngectomy series and to determine the relevance of histological margins in glottic cancers excised with laser cordectomy.
Retrospective review of laser cordectomy for carcinoma in situ (Tis) and stage T1 glottic cancer from January 1991 to January 2004.
University hospital.
Fifty-two patients with Tis or T1 glottic cancer.
Endoscopic laser cordectomy, classified using the system proposed by the European Laryngeal Society Working Committee.
Local control after initial surgery and after salvage compared with a published historical control group, according to the type of cordectomy performed and the histological margins of the removed specimen.
Sixteen patients with Tis, 30 with T1a tumors, and 6 with T1b tumors were followed up for an average of 38 months. Type I cordectomy was the most common procedure used to treat Tis, and type II and type III were the most common for treating T1a and T1b tumors. Of 6 recurrences, 4 were treated with laser cordectomy and 2 were treated with external partial laryngectomy. The rate of laryngeal preservation was 100%. There were 3 recurrences despite histologically clear margins. Three (17%) of 18 patients with suspicious margins developed recurrences. The rate of local control with single intervention (46 [89%] of 52) was lower than with partial external laryngectomy. However, 46 (89%) of 52 patients ultimately had less tissue removed by laser than would have been removed by external partial laryngectomy.
Laser cordectomy provides excellent local control and laryngeal preservation. Close follow-up of patients with positive or suspicious margins is an alternative to further routine treatment.
通过激光声带切除术评估早期声门癌的局部控制情况,并与先前发表的外部部分喉切除术系列进行比较,同时确定激光声带切除术切除的声门癌组织学切缘的相关性。
对1991年1月至2004年1月期间原位癌(Tis)和T1期声门癌的激光声带切除术进行回顾性研究。
大学医院。
52例Tis或T1期声门癌患者。
采用欧洲喉科学会工作委员会提出的系统对内镜激光声带切除术进行分类。
根据所进行的声带切除术类型和切除标本的组织学切缘,将初次手术后和挽救性手术后的局部控制情况与已发表的历史对照组进行比较。
16例Tis患者、30例T1a期肿瘤患者和6例T1b期肿瘤患者的平均随访时间为38个月。I型声带切除术是治疗Tis最常用的方法,II型和III型是治疗T1a和T1b肿瘤最常用的方法。6例复发患者中,4例接受了激光声带切除术治疗,2例接受了外部部分喉切除术治疗。喉保留率为100%。尽管组织学切缘清晰,但仍有3例复发。18例切缘可疑的患者中有3例(17%)出现复发。单次干预的局部控制率(52例中的46例[89%])低于外部部分喉切除术。然而,52例患者中有46例(89%)最终通过激光切除的组织比外部部分喉切除术切除的组织少。
激光声带切除术可提供良好的局部控制和喉保留。对切缘阳性或可疑的患者进行密切随访是替代进一步常规治疗的一种选择。