• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人体运动皮层的半正弦、单相和双相经颅磁刺激

Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.

作者信息

Sommer Martin, Alfaro Aránzazu, Rummel Milena, Speck Sascha, Lang Nicolas, Tings Tobias, Paulus Walter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Street 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):838-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.029. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.029
PMID:16495145
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare half sine transcranial magnetic stimuli (TMS) with conventional monophasic and biphasic stimuli, measuring resting and active motor threshold, motor evoked potential (MEP) input/output curve, MEP latency, and silent period duration.

METHODS

We stimulated the dominant hand representation of the motor cortex in 12 healthy subjects utilising two different MagPro stimulators to generate TMS pulses of distinct monophasic, half sine and biphasic shape with anteriorly or posteriorly directed current flow.

RESULTS

The markedly asymmetric monophasic pulse with a posterior current flow in the brain yielded a higher motor threshold, a less steep MEP input/output curve and a longer latency than all other TMS types. Similar but less pronounced results were obtained with a less asymmetric half sine pulses. The biphasic stimuli yielded the lowest motor threshold and a short latency, particularly with the posterior current direction.

CONCLUSIONS

The more asymmetric the monophasic pulse, the stronger the difference to biphasic pulses. The 3rd and 4th quarter cycle of the biphasic waveform make it longer than any other waveform studied here and likely contribute to lowering motor threshold, shortening MEP latency and reversing the influence of current direction.

SIGNIFICANCE

This systematic comparison of 3 waveforms and two current directions allows a better understanding of the mechanisms of TMS.

摘要

目的

比较半正弦经颅磁刺激(TMS)与传统单相和双相刺激,测量静息和主动运动阈值、运动诱发电位(MEP)输入/输出曲线、MEP潜伏期和静息期持续时间。

方法

我们使用两种不同的MagPro刺激器刺激12名健康受试者运动皮层的优势手代表区,以产生具有不同单相、半正弦和双相形状且电流流向为向前或向后的TMS脉冲。

结果

大脑中电流向后流动的明显不对称单相脉冲产生的运动阈值高于所有其他TMS类型,MEP输入/输出曲线较平缓,潜伏期更长。不对称程度较低的半正弦脉冲也得到了类似但不太明显的结果。双相刺激产生的运动阈值最低,潜伏期最短,尤其是电流向后时。

结论

单相脉冲越不对称,与双相脉冲的差异就越大。双相波形的第三和第四季度周期使其比此处研究的任何其他波形都长,这可能有助于降低运动阈值、缩短MEP潜伏期并扭转电流方向的影响。

意义

对三种波形和两种电流方向的这种系统比较有助于更好地理解TMS的机制。

相似文献

1
Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.人体运动皮层的半正弦、单相和双相经颅磁刺激
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):838-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.029. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
2
Comparative assessment of best conventional with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human motor cortex excitability.最佳传统方法与最佳theta波爆发重复经颅磁刺激方案对人类运动皮层兴奋性的比较评估。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Jun;119(6):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
3
Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.人类运动皮层的短程训练、单相和双相重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)之间的比较。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.020. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
4
Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.四脉冲刺激在诱导人类运动皮质可塑性方面比双脉冲刺激更有效。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2672-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.062. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
5
TMS of primary motor cortex with a biphasic pulse activates two independent sets of excitable neurones.经颅磁刺激初级运动皮层采用双相脉冲可激活两组独立的可兴奋神经元。
Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):558-565. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Stimulus waveform influences the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.刺激波形会影响重复经颅磁刺激的疗效。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Jan;97(1-3):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.06.027. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
7
Hysteresis effects on the input-output curve of motor evoked potentials.磁滞对运动诱发电位输入-输出曲线的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 May;120(5):1003-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
8
The role of pulse shape in motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation using full-sine stimuli.脉冲形状在使用全正弦刺激的运动皮层经颅磁刺激中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 16;9(12):e115247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115247. eCollection 2014.
9
Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth.运动诱发电位潜伏期、运动阈值和电场测量作为经颅磁刺激深度的指标。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;121(2):255-8; author reply 258-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
10
Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex.人类运动皮层单相和双相高频重复经颅磁刺激后效应的差异。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel non-resonant, low-frequency pulse-current circuit for energy-efficient, low-noise transcranial magnetic stimulation.用于高效节能、低噪声经颅磁刺激的新型非谐振低频脉冲电流电路。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jun 18;19:1610764. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1610764. eCollection 2025.
2
Sawtooth Magnetic Fields: An Innovative Approach to Magnetic Stimulation in Biomedical Sciences.锯齿形磁场:生物医学科学中磁刺激的一种创新方法。
Bioelectricity. 2025 Jun 9;7(2):134-138. doi: 10.1089/bioe.2025.0021. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Electroencephalographic responses before, during, and after upper limb paired associative stimulation.
上肢配对联想刺激前、中、后的脑电图反应。
Data Brief. 2025 Mar 15;60:111467. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111467. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Height-dependent variation in corticospinal excitability modulation after active but not sham intermittent theta burst stimulation.主动而非伪间歇性θ波爆发刺激后皮质脊髓兴奋性调制的高度依赖性变化。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;18:498-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.03.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Stimulation Parameters Recruit Distinct Cortico-Cortical Pathways: Insights from Microstate Analysis on TMS-Evoked Potentials.刺激参数募集不同的皮质-皮质通路:基于经颅磁刺激诱发电位微状态分析的见解
Brain Topogr. 2025 Mar 28;38(3):39. doi: 10.1007/s10548-025-01113-2.
6
A wearable repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation device.一种可穿戴式重复经颅磁刺激设备。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 19;16(1):2731. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58095-9.
7
Protocol to assess changes in brain network resistance to perturbation during offline processing using TMS-EEG.使用经颅磁刺激脑电图(TMS-EEG)评估离线处理期间脑网络对扰动的抗性变化的方案。
STAR Protoc. 2025 Mar 21;6(1):103622. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2025.103622. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
8
A novel pulse-current waveform circuit for low-energy consumption and low-noise transcranial magnetic stimulation.一种用于低能耗和低噪声经颅磁刺激的新型脉冲电流波形电路。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jan 7;18:1500619. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1500619. eCollection 2024.
9
Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.用于纳米侵入性和高分辨率磁神经调节的微制造技术
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Dec;11(46):e2404254. doi: 10.1002/advs.202404254. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
10
Direction and Directionality: The Neural Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil Orientation and Pulse Waveform.方向与方向性:经颅磁刺激线圈方向和脉冲波形的神经效应
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Aug;9(8):739-741. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.06.010.