Jones Henry Wynn, Johnston Philip, Parker Martyn
Department of Orthopaedics, Bedford Hospital, Kempston Road, MK42 9DJ, Bedford, UK.
Int Orthop. 2006 Apr;30(2):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0028-0. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the fixation outcome between the sliding hip screw (SHS) and intramedullary nails (IMN) in stable and unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures. All randomised controlled studies comparing IMNs with a SHS were considered for inclusion. Data was independently extracted and trial methodology assessed. Twenty-four randomised trials involving 3,202 patients with 3,279 fractures were included. Pooled results gave no statistically significant difference in the cut-out rate between the IMN and SHS (41/1,556 vs 37/1,626; relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.82). Total failure rate (1,03/1,495 and 58/1,565, relative risk 1.83; 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.50) and re-operation rate (57/1,357 and 35/1,415, relative risk 1.63; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.40) were greater with the IMN compared with the SHS. There was no evidence for a reduced failure rate with IMN in unstable trochanteric fractures.
本荟萃分析的目的是比较滑动髋螺钉(SHS)和髓内钉(IMN)在稳定和不稳定型股骨近端囊外骨折中的固定效果。所有比较IMN与SHS的随机对照研究均被纳入考虑。数据由独立人员提取,并对试验方法进行评估。共纳入了24项随机试验,涉及3202例患者的3279处骨折。汇总结果显示,IMN和SHS的切出率在统计学上无显著差异(41/1556对37/1626;相对风险1.19;95%置信区间0.78 - 1.82)。与SHS相比,IMN的总失败率(103/1495和58/1565,相对风险1.83;95%置信区间1.35 - 2.50)和再次手术率(57/1357和35/1415,相对风险1.63;95%置信区间1.11 - 2.40)更高。没有证据表明IMN在不稳定型转子间骨折中的失败率会降低。