Fontaine Magali J, Malone James, Mullins Franklin M, Grumet F Carl
Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, H1402, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2006 Winter;36(1):53-8.
TRALI is a challenging diagnosis for both the transfusion specialist and the clinician. A Canadian consensus panel has recently proposed guidelines to better define TRALI and its implications. The guidelines recommend classifying each suspected case in one of the following 3 categories: (1) "TRALI," (2) "Possible TRALI," or (3) "Not TRALI." We report the clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, and management of 3 patients with respiratory failure (RF) following allogeneic blood transfusions. These patients all experienced RF within 6 hr post-transfusion. Based on a review of the clinical and laboratory data and applying the Canadian guidelines, the first patient, a 67-yr-old man with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, was diagnosed as "TRALI" due to the sudden onset of RF requiring intensive resuscitation. The second patient, a 55-yr-old man with aplastic anemia, was diagnosed as "Possible TRALI" due to pre-existing RF that worsened after blood transfusion. The third patient, a 1-yr-old male, was diagnosed as transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO) and "Possible TRALI," although his RF improved after treatment with diuretics. In all 3 cases, the blood donor center was informed of the suspected TRALI reactions. The remaining blood products from the donors associated with these reactions were quarantined. After review of the clinical data, the donors associated with cases #1 and #3 were screened by the blood center for granulocyte and HLA antibodies. Using a Luminex flow bead array, the following class I and class II antibodies specific for patient #1 were identified in the respective donor: anti-A25, B8, B18, and anti-DR15, DR 17. Subsequently, donor #1 was permanently deferred. A non-specific IgM anti-granulocyte antibody was identified in the donor associated with case #3, and this donor was subsequently disqualified from plasma and platelet donations. In conclusion, the Canadian guidelines to categorize patients suspected of TRALI provide a useful framework for evaluation of these patients and their respective blood donors.
输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)对输血专科医生和临床医生来说都是一个具有挑战性的诊断。一个加拿大共识小组最近提出了一些指南,以更好地定义TRALI及其影响。这些指南建议将每个疑似病例归类为以下3类之一:(1)“TRALI”,(2)“可能的TRALI”,或(3)“非TRALI”。我们报告了3例同种异体输血后发生呼吸衰竭(RF)患者的临床表现、实验室评估及处理情况。这些患者均在输血后6小时内出现RF。基于对临床和实验室数据的回顾并应用加拿大指南,首例患者为一名67岁患有慢性粒单核细胞白血病的男性,因突然发生RF需要强化复苏而被诊断为“TRALI”。第二例患者为一名55岁患有再生障碍性贫血的男性,因输血前已存在的RF在输血后加重,被诊断为“可能的TRALI”。第三例患者为一名1岁男性,被诊断为输血相关循环超负荷(TACO)和“可能的TRALI”,尽管其RF在使用利尿剂治疗后有所改善。在所有3例病例中,均已将疑似TRALI反应告知献血中心。与这些反应相关的献血者剩余血液制品均被隔离。在审查临床数据后,血液中心对与病例1和病例3相关的献血者进行了粒细胞和HLA抗体筛查。使用Luminex流式微球阵列,在各自的献血者中为病例1鉴定出了以下I类和II类特异性抗体:抗A25、B8、B18以及抗DR15、DR17。随后,献血者1被永久延期献血。在与病例3相关的献血者中鉴定出一种非特异性IgM抗粒细胞抗体,该献血者随后被取消血浆和血小板捐献资格。总之,加拿大对疑似TRALI患者进行分类的指南为评估这些患者及其各自的献血者提供了一个有用的框架。