Ho Arthur, Manns Fabrice, Parel Jean-Marie
Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jan;32(1):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.07.047.
To predict and compare the amount of accommodation achievable by pseudophakic accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs) using optical ray-tracing analysis.
Computational laboratory.
Two-element IOLs (2E-IOL, with mobile front or back optical elements) were compared with single-element IOLs (1E-IOL). Modeling using computer-assisted ray tracing of both IOL types assumed lens elements were equiconvex/equiconcave. The 4 possible combinations of configurations representing a wide range of varying positive and negative power (up to +40 diopters [D]) of front and back optical elements were evaluated.
The 1E-IOLs offered limited amplitude of accommodation with axial shift (approximately 1.2 D/mm). For 2E-IOLs, configurations with high positive-power front elements returned the best amplitude of accommodation (up to approximately 3.0 D/mm when the front element power was +40 D).
Considering the maximum potential amounts of axial shifts available, 1E-IOLs were predicted to provide 1.0 D of accommodation or less and 2E-IOLs were predicted to provide up to 3.0 D to 4.0 D depending on design configuration and amount of axial shift achievable. Potential issues relating to accommodative aniseikonia and spherical aberration have been identified.
使用光线追迹分析预测并比较假晶状体可调节人工晶状体(IOL)所能实现的调节量。
计算实验室。
将双元件IOL(2E-IOL,具有可移动的前光学元件或后光学元件)与单元件IOL(1E-IOL)进行比较。使用计算机辅助光线追迹对两种IOL类型进行建模,假设透镜元件为等凸/等凹。评估了代表前、后光学元件各种不同正、负屈光度(高达+40屈光度[D])的4种可能配置组合。
1E-IOL随着轴向移动提供的调节幅度有限(约1.2 D/mm)。对于2E-IOL,前元件具有高正屈光度的配置返回最佳调节幅度(当前元件屈光度为+40 D时高达约3.0 D/mm)。
考虑到可用的最大轴向移动量,预计1E-IOL可提供1.0 D或更小的调节量,而2E-IOL根据设计配置和可实现的轴向移动量预计可提供高达3.0 D至4.0 D的调节量。已确定与调节性像不等和球差相关的潜在问题。