Suppr超能文献

新焦点转移型自适应人工晶状体的初步研究。

Pilot study of new focus-shift accommodating intraocular lens.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):762-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the visual and accommodative performance of the OPAL-A focus-shift accommodating intraocular lens (IOL).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

METHODS

In this study comprising unilateral phacoemulsification and accommodating IOL implantation, patients were followed for 6 months. Corrected distance (CDVA) and distance-corrected near (DCNVA) visual acuities were measured. Objective amplitude of accommodation was measured with an autorefractor and subjective amplitude of accommodation, using push-up tests and defocus curves. Physiological and pilocarpine-stimulated IOL movement was measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

The mean values at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively, were as follows: CDVA, -0.06 +/- 0.08 (SD), -0.08 +/- 0.09, and -0.05 +/- 0.09; DCNVA, 0.31 +/- 0.15, 0.31 +/- 0.15, and 0.34 +/- 0.16; objective amplitude of accommodation, 0.36 +/- 0.38 diopters (D), 0.12 +/- 0.34 D, and 0.10 +/- 0.34 D; subjective amplitude of accommodation, 2.79 +/- 0.86 D, 2.55 +/- 0.85 D, and 2.50 +/- 0.62 D with push-up test and 0.90 +/- 0.40 D, 0.78 +/- 0.23 D, and 0.93 +/- 0.35 D with defocus curves. The maximum physiologic IOL shift at 1 month (mean 45.2 +/- 63.4 microm) occurred with a 3.0 D accommodative stimulus. At 6 months, the mean pilocarpine-stimulated forward IOL shift was 306 +/- 161 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective accommodation and forward axial shift were clinically insignificant with the accommodating IOL. The near visual performance was attributed to depth of focus rather than to true pseudophakic accommodation.

摘要

目的

确定 OPAL-A 焦点转移型调节型人工晶状体的视觉和调节性能。

地点

英国伦敦圣托马斯医院眼科。

方法

在这项单侧白内障超声乳化摘除术和调节型人工晶状体植入术的研究中,患者随访 6 个月。测量矫正远距视力(CDVA)和矫正近距视力(DCNVA)。使用自动屈光仪测量客观调节幅度,使用推近测试和离焦曲线测量主观调节幅度。使用前节光学相干断层扫描测量生理性和毛果芸香碱刺激的人工晶状体运动。

结果

分别在 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时的平均值如下:CDVA,-0.06±0.08(SD)、-0.08±0.09 和-0.05±0.09;DCNVA,0.31±0.15、0.31±0.15 和 0.34±0.16;客观调节幅度,0.36±0.38 屈光度(D)、0.12±0.34 D 和 0.10±0.34 D;主观调节幅度,2.79±0.86 D、2.55±0.85 D 和 2.50±0.62 D 用推近测试,0.90±0.40 D、0.78±0.23 D 和 0.93±0.35 D 用离焦曲线。1 个月时最大生理性人工晶状体移位(平均 45.2±63.4 微米)发生在 3.0 D 调节刺激时。6 个月时,毛果芸香碱刺激的人工晶状体向前移位的平均值为 306±161 微米。

结论

调节型人工晶状体的客观调节和轴向向前移位在临床上无意义。近视力表现归因于景深而非真正的人工晶状体性调节。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验