Korytkowski Mary, Niskanen Leo, Asakura Toshinari
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Clin Ther. 2005;27 Suppl B:S89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.019.
In people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, poor adherence to insulin therapy can compromise disease management. There are several reasons for poor adherence, including social embarrassment, inconvenience, needle anxiety, fear of injection pain, and complicated regimens. Attempts to facilitate implementation of insulin therapy and to improve treatment adherence have focused on expanding the choices and features of insulin delivery devices.
This review addresses the features, advantages, and disadvantages of insulin pen devices, with particular reference to FlexPen (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), a prefilled/disposable pen device.
Data from clinical studies published through June 2005 that evaluated the safety or efficacy of FlexPen in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were reviewed. Key studies were selected following assessment of the sponsor's reference collection and as a result of MEDLINE searches (key words: FlexPen and pen devices). Particular attention was paid to studies comparing the FlexPen device with other pen devices. Peer-reviewed journal articles and published conference papers were included in the evaluation, as were reviews addressing the general use of these devices in the treatment of diabetes and associated issues.
Up to 65% of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes are not confident in their ability to effectively self-manage their disease. Only 23% of people with type 2 diabetes believe that insulin therapy would help them to better manage their disease. As many as 25% of people with diabetes who require insulin describe some anxiety regarding self-injection. Other barriers to effective insulin therapy include fear of injection pain, weight gain, and hypoglycemia; feelings of failure and guilt; and lack of motivation.
Insulin pen devices are discreet and offer patients convenience and flexibility. These features may give patients the confidence to overcome issues of needle anxiety and the social embarrassment associated with self-injection and, therefore, may lead to improved adherence to recommended insulin dosing schedules and compliance with multiple-injection regimens.
在1型或2型糖尿病患者中,胰岛素治疗依从性差会影响疾病管理。依从性差的原因有多种,包括社交尴尬、不便、针头焦虑、害怕注射疼痛以及治疗方案复杂。为促进胰岛素治疗的实施并提高治疗依从性,人们致力于扩展胰岛素给药装置的选择和功能。
本综述探讨胰岛素笔式装置的特点、优点和缺点,尤其涉及预填充/一次性笔式装置优伴笔(丹麦诺和诺德公司, Bagsvaerd)。
回顾了截至2005年6月发表的评估优伴笔在1型或2型糖尿病患者中安全性或有效性的临床研究数据。在评估申办者的参考文献集并通过医学文献数据库检索(关键词:优伴笔和笔式装置)后,挑选出关键研究。特别关注比较优伴笔式装置与其他笔式装置的研究。评估纳入了同行评审的期刊文章和已发表的会议论文,以及论述这些装置在糖尿病治疗中的一般应用及相关问题的综述。
高达65%的1型或2型糖尿病患者对自身有效管理疾病的能力缺乏信心。只有23%的2型糖尿病患者认为胰岛素治疗有助于更好地管理疾病。多达25%需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者表示对自我注射存在一定焦虑。有效胰岛素治疗的其他障碍包括害怕注射疼痛、体重增加和低血糖;失败感和内疚感;以及缺乏动力。
胰岛素笔式装置使用方便,为患者提供了便利和灵活性。这些特点可能使患者有信心克服针头焦虑和自我注射相关的社交尴尬问题,从而可能提高对推荐胰岛素给药方案的依从性以及对多次注射方案的遵从性。