Tavernier Gaël, Fletcher Gillian, Gee Ivan, Watson Adrian, Blacklock Graeme, Francis Helen, Fletcher Angela, Frank Timothy, Frank Peter, Pickering C Anthony, Niven Robert
North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, and ARIC, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan, University, UK.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Mar;117(3):656-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1311.
Many environmental factors have been investigated to determine their involvement in the asthma epidemic.
We sought to investigate the indoor environment of English children.
The Indoor Pollutants, Endotoxin, Allergens, Damp and Asthma in Manchester (IPEADAM) study recruited 200 asthmatic and age-, sex-, and sibship size-matched nonasthmatic children after a questionnaire-based community screening epidemiology survey. Their homes were sampled for several indoor air factors, and reservoir dust samples were obtained. Endotoxin, Der p 1, and dampness levels were assayed. Questionnaires were administered to record housing characteristics. Indoor pollutants, including environmental tobacco smoke, volatile organic compounds, nitrogen dioxide, formaldehyde, temperature, and relative humidity, were investigated. STATA univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the indoor environments of the children.
The levels of endotoxin (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.11-3.18; P=.018), living in a single-parent family (adjusted odds ratio, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.25-12.1; P=.019), redecoration in the living room (adjusted odds ratio, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.36-7.33; P=.008), and self-reported absence of dampness (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.91; P=.030) were all independent predictive factors of asthma. There was no difference between asthmatic and healthy children in their exposure to Der p 1, objective measurements of dampness, guardian's smoking habits, pet ownership, house type or age, time in residence, central heating systems, insulation types, glazing systems, floor types, and age and measurements of several indoor pollutants.
The IPEADAM study has shown that there were very few differences in the indoor environments of English asthmatic and nonasthmatic children. However, once asthma has been established, the presence of endotoxin is positively associated with an asthmatic child's living room carpet reservoir dust.
There are no direct clinical implications of this research, although it needs interpreting with other clinical data on endotoxin exposure in epidemiologic settings.
人们已经对许多环境因素进行了调查,以确定它们与哮喘流行的关系。
我们试图调查英国儿童的室内环境。
曼彻斯特室内污染物、内毒素、过敏原、潮湿与哮喘(IPEADAM)研究在基于问卷的社区筛查流行病学调查后,招募了200名哮喘儿童以及年龄、性别和同胞数量匹配的非哮喘儿童。对他们的家庭进行了多种室内空气因素采样,并采集了储尘样本。对内毒素、Der p 1和潮湿程度进行了检测。通过问卷调查记录住房特征。对包括环境烟草烟雾、挥发性有机化合物、二氧化氮、甲醛、温度和相对湿度在内的室内污染物进行了调查。使用STATA单变量和多变量分析来比较儿童的室内环境。
内毒素水平(调整后的优势比,1.88;95%可信区间,1.11 - 3.18;P = 0.018)、生活在单亲家庭(调整后的优势比,3.89;95%可信区间,1.25 - 12.1;P = 0.019)、客厅重新装修(调整后的优势比,3.15;95%可信区间,1.36 - 7.33;P = 0.008)以及自我报告无潮湿(调整后的优势比,0.36;95%可信区间,0.14 - 0.91;P = 0.030)均为哮喘的独立预测因素。哮喘儿童和健康儿童在接触Der p 1、客观测量的潮湿程度、监护人的吸烟习惯、是否养宠物、房屋类型或年龄、居住时间、中央供暖系统、保温类型、玻璃系统、地板类型以及几种室内污染物的年龄和测量值方面没有差异。
IPEADAM研究表明,英国哮喘儿童和非哮喘儿童的室内环境差异很小。然而,一旦哮喘确诊,内毒素的存在与哮喘儿童客厅地毯储尘呈正相关。
尽管该研究结果需要与流行病学环境中其他关于内毒素暴露的临床数据相结合进行解读,但本研究没有直接的临床意义。