Case R Maynard
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Pancreatology. 2006;6(3):180-90. doi: 10.1159/000091849. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
During my lifetime in pancreatic research, rat and mouse have largely replaced dog and cat in experimental studies. However, as this review clearly demonstrates, the anatomy, physiology and molecular cell biology of the rat pancreas (and also probably the mouse pancreas) differ substantially from those in humans. Indeed, they differ more in rat/mouse than any other common laboratory species. These differences may be irrelevant if one is using the pancreas as a generic model in which to study, say, acinar cell exocytosis or signalling. But if one is interested in more specific aspects of human pancreatic function, especially ductal function, in health and disease, in my opinion the simple answer to the question posed by the title of this article is no: other species are more appropriate.
在我从事胰腺研究的生涯中,大鼠和小鼠在实验研究中已在很大程度上取代了狗和猫。然而,正如本综述清楚表明的那样,大鼠胰腺(可能小鼠胰腺也是如此)的解剖学、生理学和分子细胞生物学与人类的有很大差异。事实上,大鼠/小鼠与人类的差异比任何其他常见实验物种都要大。如果将胰腺用作通用模型来研究,比如腺泡细胞胞吐作用或信号传导,这些差异可能无关紧要。但如果有人对人类胰腺功能的更具体方面感兴趣,尤其是在健康和疾病状态下的导管功能,依我看,对于本文标题所提出问题的简单答案是否定的:其他物种更合适。