Mackillop James, Anderson Emily J, Castelda Bryan A, Mattson Richard E, Donovick Peter J
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):75-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.75.
The present study investigated the convergent validity of the Gamblers' Beliefs Questionnaire (GBQ), Gambling Passion Scale (GPS), Eysenck Impulsivity Questionnaire (EIQ), and Stanford Time Perception Inventory (STPI) in reference to pathological gambling. The authors recruited 105 undergraduates representing categories of pathological gamblers, potential pathological gamblers, and nonpathological gamblers and administered the measures under neutral conditions. Both subscales of the GBQ and GPS and the Impulsivity subscale of the EIQ exhibited strong convergent validity, whereas the STPI showed weaker correspondence with symptoms of pathological gambling. Applications and limitations of these findings are discussed.
本研究针对病态赌博调查了赌徒信念问卷（GBQ）、赌博热情量表（GPS）、艾森克冲动性问卷（EIQ）和斯坦福时间知觉量表（STPI）的收敛效度。作者招募了105名本科生，分别代表病态赌徒、潜在病态赌徒和非病态赌徒类别，并在中性条件下实施了这些测量。GBQ和GPS的两个分量表以及EIQ的冲动性分量表都表现出很强的收敛效度，而STPI与病态赌博症状的对应关系较弱。本文讨论了这些研究结果的应用和局限性。
