• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物预期对于人类注意力的刺激控制、工具性觅药行为和主观愉悦感而言是必要的。

Drug expectancy is necessary for stimulus control of human attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and subjective pleasure.

作者信息

Hogarth Lee, Dickinson Anthony, Hutton Sam B, Elbers Nieke, Duka Theodora

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 May;185(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0287-x. Epub 2006 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00213-005-0287-x
PMID:16547713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that drug-paired stimuli (S+) control addictive behaviour by eliciting an explicit mental representation or expectation of drug availability.

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to test this hypothesis by determining whether the behavioural control exerted by a tobacco-paired S+ in human smokers would depend upon the S+ eliciting an explicit expectation of tobacco.

DESIGN

In each trial, human smokers (n=16) were presented with stimuli for which attention was measured with an eyetracker. Participants then reported their cigarette reward expectancy before performing, or not, an instrumental tobacco-seeking response that was rewarded with cigarette gains if the S+ had been presented or punished with cigarette losses if the S- had been presented. Following training, participants rated the pleasantness of stimuli.

RESULTS

The S+ only brought about conditioned behaviour in an aware group (those who expected the cigarette reward outcome when presented with the S+). This aware group allocated attention to the S+, performed the instrumental tobacco-seeking response selectively in the presence of the S+ and rated the S+ as pleasant. No conditioned behaviour was seen in the unaware group (those who did not expect the cigarette reward outcome in the presence of the S+).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-paired stimuli control selective attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and positive emotional state by eliciting an explicit expectation of drug availability.

摘要

背景

有人提出,与药物配对的刺激(S+)通过引发对药物可得性的明确心理表征或预期来控制成瘾行为。

目的

本研究的目的是通过确定在人类吸烟者中与烟草配对的S+所施加的行为控制是否取决于S+引发对烟草的明确预期,来检验这一假设。

设计

在每次试验中,向人类吸烟者(n = 16)呈现刺激,并使用眼动仪测量其注意力。参与者随后报告他们对香烟奖励的预期,然后进行或不进行工具性的烟草寻求反应,如果呈现S+,该反应会因获得香烟而得到奖励,如果呈现S-,则会因失去香烟而受到惩罚。训练后,参与者对刺激的愉悦程度进行评分。

结果

S+仅在有意识的组(那些在呈现S+时预期有香烟奖励结果的人)中引发了条件性行为。这个有意识的组将注意力分配到S+上,在S+出现时选择性地进行工具性的烟草寻求反应,并将S+评为愉悦。在无意识的组(那些在呈现S+时没有预期到香烟奖励结果的人)中没有观察到条件性行为。

结论

与药物配对的刺激通过引发对药物可得性的明确预期来控制选择性注意力、工具性药物寻求行为和积极情绪状态。

相似文献

1
Drug expectancy is necessary for stimulus control of human attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and subjective pleasure.药物预期对于人类注意力的刺激控制、工具性觅药行为和主观愉悦感而言是必要的。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 May;185(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0287-x. Epub 2006 Mar 18.
2
Discriminative stimuli that control instrumental tobacco-seeking by human smokers also command selective attention.控制人类吸烟者工具性寻烟行为的辨别性刺激也会引起选择性注意。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Aug;168(4):435-45. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1456-4. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?人类尼古丁条件作用需要明确的偶然性知识:成瘾行为是由认知介导的吗?
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0. Epub 2005 Sep 21.
4
Contingency knowledge is necessary for learned motivated behaviour in humans: relevance for addictive behaviour.偶然性知识对于人类习得的动机性行为是必要的:与成瘾行为的相关性。
Addiction. 2006 Aug;101(8):1153-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01459.x.
5
Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour.人类吸烟行为中刺激-结果偶联的显性知识以及选择性注意和工具性动作的刺激控制。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Feb;177(4):428-37. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1973-9. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
6
Mechanisms of attention to conditioned stimuli predictive of a cigarette outcome.注意条件刺激的机制,这些刺激可预测吸烟结果。
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Jun 15;232(1):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
7
Predictive but not emotional value of Pavlovian stimuli leads to pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.巴甫洛夫式刺激的预测价值而非情感价值会导致巴甫洛夫式到工具性的转换。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 15;321:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking.药物预期在控制人类药物寻求行为中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):484-96. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.484.
9
Extinction of cue-evoked drug-seeking relies on degrading hierarchical instrumental expectancies.线索诱发的药物寻求行为的消退依赖于降低层次化的工具性预期。
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Aug;59(100):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
10
Evaluating psychological markers for human nicotine dependence: tobacco choice, extinction, and Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.评估人类尼古丁依赖的心理标志物:烟草选择、消退和巴甫洛夫到工具的转移。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jun;20(3):213-24. doi: 10.1037/a0027203. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits and its modulation by acute stress in individuals with risky gaming behavior.从目标导向行为向刺激-反应习惯的转移及其在有风险赌博行为的个体中被急性应激所调节。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):26015. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73899-3.
2
Does acute stress influence the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effect? Implications for substance use disorders.急性应激是否会影响巴甫洛夫到工具性转移效应?对物质使用障碍的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Aug;237(8):2305-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05534-8. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
3
Knowledge about the predictive value of reward conditioned stimuli modulates their interference with cognitive processes.

本文引用的文献

1
Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?人类尼古丁条件作用需要明确的偶然性知识:成瘾行为是由认知介导的吗?
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0. Epub 2005 Sep 21.
2
Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention.不确定性、神经调节与注意力。
Neuron. 2005 May 19;46(4):681-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026.
3
Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness.差异延迟眨眼经典条件反射的习得与意识无关。
关于奖励条件刺激的预测价值的知识会调节它们对认知过程的干扰。
Learn Mem. 2019 Feb 15;26(3):66-76. doi: 10.1101/lm.048272.118. Print 2019 Mar.
4
Creating a Theoretically Grounded, Gamified Health App: Lessons From Developing the Cigbreak Smoking Cessation Mobile Phone Game.创建一个理论基础扎实的、游戏化的健康应用程序:开发戒烟手机游戏Cigbreak的经验教训。
JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Nov 29;6(4):e10252. doi: 10.2196/10252.
5
Visual Attention to Antismoking PSAs: Smoking Cues Versus Other Attention-Grabbing Features.对反吸烟公益广告的视觉关注:吸烟线索与其他吸引注意力的特征
Hum Commun Res. 2011 Apr 1;37(2):275-292. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01402.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
6
Conditioned cues for smoking elicit preparatory responses in healthy smokers.吸烟条件线索会诱发健康吸烟者的预备反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Feb;213(4):781-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2033-2. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
7
The associative basis of cue-elicited drug taking in humans.人类线索诱发药物摄取的联想基础。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Feb;208(3):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1735-9. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
8
Evidence for habitual and goal-directed behavior following devaluation of cocaine: a multifaceted interpretation of relapse.可卡因减损后习惯性和目标导向行为的证据:对复吸的多方面解读。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 25;4(9):e7170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007170.
9
Acute alcohol decreases performance of an instrumental response to avoid aversive consequences in social drinkers.急性酒精会降低社交饮酒者为避免不良后果而做出工具性反应的表现。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Sep;205(4):577-87. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1565-9. Epub 2009 May 26.
10
The role of attentional bias in mediating human drug-seeking behaviour.注意偏向在介导人类觅药行为中的作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Nov;201(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1244-2. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
Behav Neurosci. 2005 Feb;119(1):78-86. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.78.
4
Cognitive processes in extinction.消退中的认知过程。
Learn Mem. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):495-500. doi: 10.1101/lm.79604.
5
Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour.人类吸烟行为中刺激-结果偶联的显性知识以及选择性注意和工具性动作的刺激控制。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Feb;177(4):428-37. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1973-9. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
6
Cognitive and social learning models of drug dependence: implications for the assessment of tobacco dependence in adolescents.药物依赖的认知与社会学习模型:对青少年烟草依赖评估的启示
Addiction. 2004 Jun;99 Suppl 1:51-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00737.x.
7
Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation.巴甫洛夫式工具性转移与强化物贬值之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Apr;30(2):104-17. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.2.104.
8
Prefrontal responses to drug cues: a neurocognitive analysis.前额叶对药物线索的反应:一项神经认知分析。
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar;7(3):211-4. doi: 10.1038/nn1200. Epub 2004 Feb 24.
9
Lack of startle modulation by smoking cues in smokers.吸烟者对吸烟线索缺乏惊跳调节。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Apr;173(1-2):160-6. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1715-4. Epub 2004 Jan 15.
10
Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation.对吸烟相关线索的眼动:尼古丁戒断的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Apr;173(1-2):116-23. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1689-2. Epub 2003 Dec 9.