Suppr超能文献

家庭健康护理与赋能关系。

Family health nursing and empowering relationships.

作者信息

Aston Megan, Meagher-Stewart Donna, Sheppard-Lemoine Debbie, Vukic Adele, Chircop Andrea

机构信息

School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1):61-7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine how empowerment, as an ideology and a practice of teaching and learning, was understood and applied by public health nurses (PHNs) in health education with child bearing and child rearing families.

METHOD

Feminist poststructuralism was used to guide data collection and analysis. In-depth, individual interviews were conducted with three mothers and three PHNs and explored the different perspectives held by mothers and PHNs during a home visit.

FINDINGS

Moments of conflict, contradiction, affirmation, and agreement highlighted various empowering relations. Individual choice and recognition of knowledge and power exemplified how both mothers and PHNs used their "agency" to position themselves into a particular relationship. The analysis includes five sections: (a) mother's perceptions of PHNs, (b) normalization as problematic: the good/bad dichotomy, (c) professional/expert: the balance of power, (d) working the relationship, and (e) reflections on empowerment.

CONCLUSION

The information gathered from this studyprovides a rich understanding of the nurses' educational practices with new mothers.

摘要

目的

探讨作为一种思想观念以及教学与学习实践的赋权,是如何被公共卫生护士(PHNs)在对生育和育儿家庭进行健康教育时所理解和应用的。

方法

采用女性主义后结构主义指导数据收集与分析。对三位母亲和三位公共卫生护士进行了深入的个人访谈,并探讨了在家庭访视期间母亲和公共卫生护士所持的不同观点。

结果

冲突、矛盾、肯定和一致的时刻凸显了各种赋权关系。个人选择以及对知识与权力的认可例证了母亲和公共卫生护士如何利用她们的“能动性”将自己置于一种特定的关系中。分析包括五个部分:(a)母亲对公共卫生护士的看法,(b)作为问题的常态化:好坏二分法,(c)专业人员/专家:权力平衡,(d)处理关系,以及(e)对赋权的反思。

结论

从本研究收集到的信息为理解护士对新妈妈的教育实践提供了丰富的资料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验