• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用健康信息系统设计、开发与实施的评估框架。

Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation.

作者信息

Kaufman David, Roberts Wm Dan, Merrill Jacqueline, Lai Tsai-Ya, Bakken Suzanne

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, NY State Psychiastric Institute, Columbia University School of Nursing, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;55(2 Suppl):S37-42. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200603001-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00006199-200603001-00007
PMID:16601633
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dramatic advances in health information technologies necessitate a comprehensive evaluation framework covering all phases of development, from conception to routine operational use.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article was to illustrate the application of an informatics evaluation framework that provides a heuristic for matching the stage of system design and the level of evaluation.

METHODS

An evaluation framework is illustrated in the context of five studies in different stages of system design.

RESULTS

The studies discussed in this article represent the various stages of the framework. In addition, they are examples of how evaluation research studies not only contribute to the assessment of system design but also constitute distinct contributions to knowledge.

DISCUSSION

The ability to engineer advanced information systems has exceeded the understanding of how to deploy them effectively in complex settings and to adapt them to a range of user populations. A systematic, continuous evaluation increases the likelihood that the conditions for success will be understood, including how to tailor a system, how to maintain the target population's use of the system, and how to innovate continually to enhance the functionality of the system and the users' experience. Without sound evaluation methodologies throughout the stages of system development, information systems have limited potential to influence healthcare processes positively.

摘要

背景

健康信息技术的巨大进步需要一个全面的评估框架,涵盖从概念构思到日常运营使用的所有发展阶段。

目的

本文旨在阐述一种信息学评估框架的应用,该框架为匹配系统设计阶段和评估水平提供了一种启发式方法。

方法

在系统设计不同阶段的五项研究背景下阐述一个评估框架。

结果

本文讨论的研究代表了该框架的各个阶段。此外,它们还展示了评估研究如何不仅有助于系统设计评估,还能为知识做出独特贡献。

讨论

设计先进信息系统的能力已经超过了对如何在复杂环境中有效部署这些系统以及如何使其适应不同用户群体的理解。系统的、持续的评估增加了理解成功条件的可能性,包括如何定制系统、如何维持目标人群对系统的使用,以及如何持续创新以增强系统功能和用户体验。如果在系统开发的各个阶段没有完善的评估方法,信息系统对医疗保健流程产生积极影响的潜力将十分有限。

相似文献

1
Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation.应用健康信息系统设计、开发与实施的评估框架。
Nurs Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;55(2 Suppl):S37-42. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200603001-00007.
2
Cognitive evaluation: how to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare.认知评估:如何评估医疗保健领域中信息技术的可用性。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1997 Sep;54(1-2):19-28. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2607(97)00030-8.
3
Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide.临床信息系统实施的结果评估:实用指南
Nurs Outlook. 2007 Nov-Dec;55(6):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003.
4
Evaluation of a prototype health information system using the FITT framework.使用FITT框架对一个健康信息系统原型进行评估。
Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(1):47-9. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v19i1.793.
5
The SAPPHIRE toolkit: an interactive system for the evaluation of primary healthcare computing.
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1672.
6
A user-centered, object-oriented methodology for developing Health Information Systems: a Clinical Information System (CIS) example.以用户为中心、面向对象的方法开发健康信息系统:临床信息系统(CIS)示例。
J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):437-50. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9488-x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
7
Implementation and evaluation of telehealth tools and technologies.远程医疗工具和技术的实施和评估。
Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):96-102. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0182.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
Understanding end-user support for health information technology: a theoretical framework.理解终端用户对健康信息技术的支持:一个理论框架。
Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(3):169-72. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v19i3.810.
10
Interaction design theory.交互设计理论。
Int J Med Inform. 2003 Mar;69(2-3):205-22. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00106-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model.了解数字健康技术在康复中的应用:康复技术实施模型的开发。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 15:2025.07.11.25331266. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.25331266.
2
Systematic Review of Usability Factors, Models, and Frameworks with Blockchain Integration for Secure Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications.对用于安全移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的区块链集成的可用性因素、模型和框架的系统评价。
Blockchain Healthc Today. 2024 Dec 16;7. doi: 10.30953/bhty.v7.357. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of IMPALA 2.0: Addressing Patient Monitoring in Low-Resource Hospitals in Malawi.
IMPALA 2.0评估:解决马拉维资源匮乏医院的患者监测问题。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Dec 23;30:e945856. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945856.
4
Realizing the Full Potential of Clinical Decision Support: Translating Usability Testing into Routine Practice in Health Care Operations.实现临床决策支持的全部潜力:将可用性测试转化为医疗保健运营中的常规实践。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1039-1048. doi: 10.1055/a-2404-2129. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
The Solutions in Health Analytics for Rural Equity Across the Northwest (SHARE-NW) Dashboard for Health Equity in Rural Public Health: Usability Evaluation.健康分析解决方案助力西北农村公平(SHARE-NW)农村公共卫生公平仪表板:可用性评估。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 5;11:e51666. doi: 10.2196/51666.
6
Pilot testing of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Registry.国际心血管预防与康复学会注册研究的预试验。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Jul 7;35(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad050.
7
Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach.设计和验证一种新的医疗保健系统可用性量表(HSUS)用于临床决策支持系统:一种混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e065323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323.
8
The Assessment of Medical Device Software Supporting Health Care Services for Chronic Patients in a Tertiary Hospital: Overarching Study.医疗器械软件评估支持三级医院慢性病患者的医疗保健服务:总体研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 4;25:e40976. doi: 10.2196/40976.
9
Scoping review of health information technology usability methods leveraged in Africa.在非洲利用的卫生信息技术可用性方法的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):726-737. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac236.
10
Publicly Available, Interactive Web-Based Tools to Support Advance Care Planning: Systematic Review.公开可用的交互式网络工具以支持预先护理计划:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e33320. doi: 10.2196/33320.