Abraham Andy, Collins Dave, Martindale Russell
School of Social Studies, Bell College, Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2006 Jun;24(6):549-64. doi: 10.1080/02640410500189173.
Current research in coaching development infers that coaching is predominantly a decision-making process. The same and other research is not, however, informing the coaching development process due to a lack of a big picture approach. Consequently, there is a need for a model of coaching. In this paper, we offer such a model in the form of a schematic that reflects the coaching process from both a content and information-processing stance. To assess the validity of the schematic, 16 expert coaches were interviewed to elicit a complete description of their coaching process. The coaches were then shown a copy of the schematic and asked to comment on its design and content with respect to its accuracy in reflecting their coaching process. Following analysis of the interview, six general categories emerged: Roles, Goals, Typical Actions, Required Knowledge, Support for the Schematic, and Factors Influencing Development. The first four categories clearly displayed an implicit support for the schematic. Furthermore, all coaches offered explicit support for the schematic. Such strong support confirmed that the schematic was valid and could form the basis of focused interventions in coaching development.
当前教练发展领域的研究推断，教练工作主要是一个决策过程。然而，由于缺乏宏观视角，同样的研究以及其他研究并未为教练发展过程提供信息。因此，需要一个教练模型。在本文中，我们以示意图的形式提供了这样一个模型，该示意图从内容和信息处理的角度反映了教练过程。为了评估该示意图的有效性，我们采访了16位专家教练，以获取他们教练过程的完整描述。然后向教练们展示了该示意图的副本，并要求他们就其在反映教练过程准确性方面的设计和内容发表评论。在对访谈进行分析后，出现了六个一般类别：角色、目标、典型行动、所需知识、对示意图的支持以及影响发展的因素。前四个类别明确显示出对该示意图的隐性支持。此外，所有教练都对该示意图给予了明确支持。如此有力的支持证实了该示意图是有效的，并且可以作为教练发展中重点干预措施的基础。
