Mansur Letícia Lessa, Radanovic Márcia, Araújo Gisele de Carvalho, Taquemori Laís Yassue, Greco Lílian Lavine
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo.
Pro Fono. 2006 Jan-Apr;18(1):13-20. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000100003.
The Boston Naming Test is frequently used to evaluate naming deficits. The scores used in Brazil have been the same as those used in the American version. In the case of individuals with poor schooling associated to cerebral lesions, a frequent situation in our country, one runs the risk of considering a poor performance as a deficit, what in fact is a consequence of lack of knowledge and cultural deprivation.
to evaluate the influence of age and schooling in the naming ability of normal individuals, from São Paulo city, in a visual confrontation task.
133 normal volunteers, aged between 28 and 70 years.
the scores obtained in spontaneous naming were [mean (SD)]: [39.4 (9.8)]; per age group: 28 - 50 years [39.5 (10.5)], 51 - 70 years [39.1 (9.1)]; per schooling: 1 - 4 years [33.7 (9.6)], 5 - 8 years [36.6 (7.9)], 9 or more [47.4 (6)]. The comparison between the performances of the two age groups did not reveal any significant differences. Higher educational level determined a better performance both in spontaneous and facilitated naming. Cues of stimuli were necessary for the individuals to access the correct name, especially for the group with lower educational level. Phonemic cues, on the other hand, benefited individuals with more than eight years of formal education. The suggested cut-off score for the test to be use in Brazil was calculated by the ROC curve analysis and based on the comparison between normal and aphasic individuals.
schooling was the variable that had the greatest influence on performance. Although the level of difficulty of a few items may, to some extent, differ between English and Portuguese, the translated version of the BNT can be used without any adaptations for the Brazilian population, provided that the level of education is taken in consideration when interpreting the results.
波士顿命名测试常用于评估命名缺陷。巴西使用的分数与美国版本相同。对于我国常见的伴有脑损伤且受教育程度低的个体,存在将其不佳表现视为缺陷的风险,而这实际上是知识缺乏和文化匮乏的结果。
评估年龄和受教育程度对圣保罗市正常个体在视觉呈现任务中命名能力的影响。
133名年龄在28至70岁之间的正常志愿者。
自发命名所得分数[均值(标准差)]为:[39.4(9.8)];按年龄组划分:28 - 50岁[39.5(10.5)],51 - 70岁[39.1(9.1)];按受教育程度划分:1 - 4年[33.7(9.6)],5 - 8年[36.6(7.9)],9年及以上[47.4(6)]。两个年龄组的表现比较未显示出任何显著差异。较高的教育水平在自发命名和提示命名中均表现出更好的成绩。刺激线索对于个体说出正确名称是必要的,尤其是对于受教育程度较低的组。另一方面,音素线索对接受过八年以上正规教育的个体有益。通过ROC曲线分析并基于正常个体与失语个体的比较,计算出了巴西使用该测试的建议临界分数。
受教育程度是对表现影响最大的变量。尽管英语和葡萄牙语中少数项目的难度水平可能在一定程度上有所不同,但BNT的翻译版本可直接用于巴西人群,前提是在解释结果时考虑到教育水平。